About 75% of companies don’t have adequate Cyber Security Incident Response Plans (IRPs), so how Cyber Resilient is your Company? Or Law Firm?

18 November 2016 Internet, IT & e-Discovery Blog Blog
Authors: Peter Vogel

Of the 2,000 IT and IT security professionals surveyed by the Ponemon Institute “75% of respondents admit they do not have a formal cyber security incident response plan (CSIRP) that is applied consistently across the organization” and 51% rated cyber resilience as “very important or essential to achieving a strong security posture.”  The November 2016 Ponemon report entitled “The 2016 Cyber Resilient Organization- Executive Summary” (sponsored by Resilient an IBM company) started with this definition of Cyber Resilience:

The capacity of an enterprise to maintain its core purpose and integrity in the face of cyber attacks.

Networkworld’s November 16, 2016 report entitled “IBM: Many companies still ill-prepared for cyber attacks” highlighted these key results from the Ponemon study:

  • Of those with a CSIRP in place, 52% have either not reviewed or updated the plan since it was put in place, or have no set plan for doing so.
  • 41% say the time to resolve a cyber incident has increased in the past 12 months, compared to only 31% who say it has decreased.
  • 74% say they faced threats due to human error in the past year
  • When examining the past two years, 74% say they have been compromised by malware on a frequent basis, and 64% have been compromised by phishing on a frequent basis
  • 68% don’t believe their organizations have the ability to remain resilient in the wake of a cyberattack
  • 66% aren’t confident in their organization’s ability to effectively recover from an attack
  • 25% have an incident response plan applied consistently across the organization. 23% have no incident response plan at all
  • Only 14% test their incident response plans more than one time per year
  • 66% cite a lack of planning as their organization’s biggest barrier to becoming resilient to cyberattacks
  • 48% say their organization’s Cyber Resilience has either declined (4 percent) or not improved (44%) over the past 12 months
  • 41% say the time to resolve a cyber incident has increased or increased significantly, while only 31% say it has decreased or decreased significantly
  • In 2015, the average cybersecurity budget was $10 million. This increased to an average of $11.4 million. More funding has been allocated to cyber resilience-related activities. In 2015, 26% of the IT security budget was allocated to cyber resilience related activities. This increased to 30% in 2016.

No surprises here, but what are you doing for cyber protection?

This blog is made available by Foley & Lardner LLP (“Foley” or “the Firm”) for informational purposes only. It is not meant to convey the Firm’s legal position on behalf of any client, nor is it intended to convey specific legal advice. Any opinions expressed in this article do not necessarily reflect the views of Foley & Lardner LLP, its partners, or its clients. Accordingly, do not act upon this information without seeking counsel from a licensed attorney. This blog is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship. Communicating with Foley through this website by email, blog post, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship for any legal matter. Therefore, any communication or material you transmit to Foley through this blog, whether by email, blog post or any other manner, will not be treated as confidential or proprietary. The information on this blog is published “AS IS” and is not guaranteed to be complete, accurate, and or up-to-date. Foley makes no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, as to the operation or content of the site. Foley expressly disclaims all other guarantees, warranties, conditions and representations of any kind, either express or implied, whether arising under any statute, law, commercial use or otherwise, including implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Foley or any of its partners, officers, employees, agents or affiliates be liable, directly or indirectly, under any theory of law (contract, tort, negligence or otherwise), to you or anyone else, for any claims, losses or damages, direct, indirect special, incidental, punitive or consequential, resulting from or occasioned by the creation, use of or reliance on this site (including information and other content) or any third party websites or the information, resources or material accessed through any such websites. In some jurisdictions, the contents of this blog may be considered Attorney Advertising. If applicable, please note that prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Photographs are for dramatization purposes only and may include models. Likenesses do not necessarily imply current client, partnership or employee status.

Authors

Related Services

Insights

RCE PTA Carve-Out Resumes After Interference
18 September 2019
PharmaPatents
Upcoming Webinar: Maximizing Solar Tax Credits - Navigating the Start of Construction Rules (Part 1)
17 September 2019
Renewable Energy Outlook
When Birds Finally Find a Nest
17 September 2019
Dashboard Insights
DHS Moves Closer to Launching its H-1B Cap Registration System
16 September 2019
Labor & Employment Law Perspectives
MedTech Impact Expo & Conference
13-15 December 2019
Las Vegas, NV
Review of 2020 Medicare Changes for Telehealth
11 December 2019
Member Call
BRG Healthcare Leadership Conference
06 December 2019
Washington, D.C.
CTeL Telehealth Fall Summit 2019
04-06 December 2019
Washington, D.C.