Cities Plan for Future of Autonomous Cars

12 June 2017 Dashboard Insights Blog
Author(s): Lauren M. Loew

One year ago, we posted about the National Association of City Officials’s (NACTO) policy recommendations for autonomous vehicles. NACTO focused on the projected infrastructure requirements for autonomous vehicles. Now, the National League of Cities (NLC) is weighing in that cities need to speed up their efforts of preparing for autonomous cars.

In its Autonomous Vehicles – A Policy Preparation Guide, NLC pointed out several key areas of infrastructure development, including two sometimes overlooked components – the broadband needs of a mixed autonomous vehicle transportation system, and how to handle the terabytes of data that will be created by autonomous vehicle technologies.  NLC recommended cities work hand-in-hand with regional broadband providers to begin planning this technology now in order to support the wireless needs of the future, which will dwarf the needs of today.  Cities will also need to budget for the data processing, storage, and security of the massive amount of data that will be generated.  This data will raise privacy and cyber security concerns.  The report identifies partnerships with local academic institutions as one potential way to obtain affordable access to data storage and processing.

Although a McKinsey & Company report predicts fully autonomous vehicles remain a decade away from hitting the roads, connected car technologies are already prevalent in today’s vehicles and vehicle manufacturers plan to begin producing fully autonomous vehicles within the next four years.  In the world of infrastructure planning, autonomous vehicles and their needs are just around the corner.

This blog is made available by Foley & Lardner LLP (“Foley” or “the Firm”) for informational purposes only. It is not meant to convey the Firm’s legal position on behalf of any client, nor is it intended to convey specific legal advice. Any opinions expressed in this article do not necessarily reflect the views of Foley & Lardner LLP, its partners, or its clients. Accordingly, do not act upon this information without seeking counsel from a licensed attorney. This blog is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship. Communicating with Foley through this website by email, blog post, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship for any legal matter. Therefore, any communication or material you transmit to Foley through this blog, whether by email, blog post or any other manner, will not be treated as confidential or proprietary. The information on this blog is published “AS IS” and is not guaranteed to be complete, accurate, and or up-to-date. Foley makes no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, as to the operation or content of the site. Foley expressly disclaims all other guarantees, warranties, conditions and representations of any kind, either express or implied, whether arising under any statute, law, commercial use or otherwise, including implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Foley or any of its partners, officers, employees, agents or affiliates be liable, directly or indirectly, under any theory of law (contract, tort, negligence or otherwise), to you or anyone else, for any claims, losses or damages, direct, indirect special, incidental, punitive or consequential, resulting from or occasioned by the creation, use of or reliance on this site (including information and other content) or any third party websites or the information, resources or material accessed through any such websites. In some jurisdictions, the contents of this blog may be considered Attorney Advertising. If applicable, please note that prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Photographs are for dramatization purposes only and may include models. Likenesses do not necessarily imply current client, partnership or employee status.

Related Services