Arbitrator Awards $40 Million in Gender and Sexual Orientation Case

25 September 2017 Labor & Employment Law Perspectives Blog
Authors: John F. Birmingham Jr

Employers face several trade-offs when considering the implementation of mandatory arbitration policies. One of the positive attributes of arbitration, from an employer’s perspective, is the avoidance of a runaway jury award.  However, a recent arbitration decision provides a reminder that arbitration does not necessarily foreclose a huge award.

In a May 31, 207 decision, an arbitrator (who is also a former judge) in New York awarded over $40 million to a marketing company’s former senior vice president. In a comprehensive 83 page decision, the arbitrator concluded that inappropriate comments were made about the former executive’s gender and sexual orientation, that her complaints were ignored, and that the termination was a “collaborative orchestration carried out in a malicious, insidious, and humiliating manner . . . “

The award included back pay, equity awards, emotional distress, and liquidated damages. The executive’s attorney has recently filed a motion to confirm the arbitrator’s award with the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. At the same time, the employer is asking the court to entirely vacate the arbitration award or to reduce the amount by almost $37 million. The company argues that the arbitrator was not candid about her background and that they would not have chosen her as an arbitrator if she had disclosed such information. The company also contends that the arbitrator misapplied the law, causing the original $3 million claim to mushroom into $40 million plus.

While the merits of the arbitrator’s opinion and an assessment of the litigation efforts of both sides are beyond the scope of this article, it provides certain lessons for employers. First, arbitration is not a guarantee against very large awards.  Therefore, strong problem prevention and risk mitigation steps should be employed, before any claim arises, regardless of the forum. Also, litigation of the matter must be pursued with the same vigor as if the case was in court.  Second, without casting aspersions on this particular arbitrator, arbitrator selection may be among the most important, but least emphasized, decisions in litigating the case. Third, under the applicable standards, it is extremely difficult to overturn an arbitration award, so realize that you will very likely have to live with the results.

While arbitration may very well be the right choice for a particular employer, this award should serve as a warning that an employer cannot take false comfort in a mandatory arbitration policy.

This blog is made available by Foley & Lardner LLP (“Foley” or “the Firm”) for informational purposes only. It is not meant to convey the Firm’s legal position on behalf of any client, nor is it intended to convey specific legal advice. Any opinions expressed in this article do not necessarily reflect the views of Foley & Lardner LLP, its partners, or its clients. Accordingly, do not act upon this information without seeking counsel from a licensed attorney. This blog is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship. Communicating with Foley through this website by email, blog post, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship for any legal matter. Therefore, any communication or material you transmit to Foley through this blog, whether by email, blog post or any other manner, will not be treated as confidential or proprietary. The information on this blog is published “AS IS” and is not guaranteed to be complete, accurate, and or up-to-date. Foley makes no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, as to the operation or content of the site. Foley expressly disclaims all other guarantees, warranties, conditions and representations of any kind, either express or implied, whether arising under any statute, law, commercial use or otherwise, including implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Foley or any of its partners, officers, employees, agents or affiliates be liable, directly or indirectly, under any theory of law (contract, tort, negligence or otherwise), to you or anyone else, for any claims, losses or damages, direct, indirect special, incidental, punitive or consequential, resulting from or occasioned by the creation, use of or reliance on this site (including information and other content) or any third party websites or the information, resources or material accessed through any such websites. In some jurisdictions, the contents of this blog may be considered Attorney Advertising. If applicable, please note that prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Photographs are for dramatization purposes only and may include models. Likenesses do not necessarily imply current client, partnership or employee status.

Related Services