Austin Becomes First Texas City to Mandate Paid Sick Leave

20 February 2018 Labor & Employment Law Perspectives Blog
Authors: Carrie Hoffman

In our previous post, we introduced the city of Austin’s proposed sick leave ordinance, which the city council approved at last week’s meeting. Gardere’s Fred Sultan, a member of the labor and employment group in Austin, provides an update:

In the early hours of Feb. 16, Austin became the first city in Texas to require employers provide paid sick leave to their employees—whether full or part time. Any employer that has an employee in Austin—or even an employee elsewhere who spends some time working in Austin—should pay attention.

Here’s what you need to know right now:

  • Employees Covered: Any employee who works in Austin for at least 80 hours per calendar year will be required to receive paid sick leave and their employer must meet the ordinance’s other requirements for Austin employees.
  • Effective Date: For those who employ more than 5 employees, the ordinance comes into effect on October 1, 2018. Smaller employees have until October 1, 2020.
  • Leave Requirement: Employers must provide one hour of leave for every 30 hours worked to a maximum of 64 hours per year. Those who have less than 16 employees have a lower cap of 48 hours paid sick leave.
  • Use of Leave: Employees are entitled to use leave as soon as it accrues; however, employers may be able to have a 60-day probationary period for employees who have a term of employment that is at least one year.
  • Existing Leave Policies: Existing sick leave or paid time off policies will satisfy the ordinance as long as they are at least as generous as the ordinance. However, employers should seek counsel to ensure their existing policies fully comply.
  • Administrative and Notice Requirements: The ordinance requires employers to post an approved notice of the sick-leave entitlement, and include a notice of employees’ rights and remedies in employer handbooks.
  • Retaliation Prohibited: The ordinance prohibits employers from retaliating against employees for exercising their rights under the ordinance or participating in any complaint under the ordinance.

While there are many other details contained in the ordinance, these points demonstrate that all employers need to seek counsel and ensure their policies and procedures are in compliance by the effective date.

The new law clearly has implications for private employers that do not currently provide sick leave or paid time off to their employees. On October 1, 2018, those employers will need to begin providing benefits and complying with the record-keeping and other aspects of the ordinance.

What is easy to overlook is that businesses that already offer sick leave will also be impacted. For example, many businesses offer leave for full-time employees, but do not do so for some part time or seasonal employees. As noted above, the ordinance requires an employer to provide sick leave for any employee who works for more than 80 hours in a year within the City of Austin. That means that a college student hired over the summer would need to accrue leave. Also, a year-round part-time employee working less than an average of 2 hours per week would begin to earn sick leave. Additionally, an employee who mainly works in another city, but works in Austin for the requisite 80 hours in a year, would be covered by the ordinance. As a result, all employers should review their leave policies to make sure they are ready to comply with the new law.

This blog is made available by Foley & Lardner LLP (“Foley” or “the Firm”) for informational purposes only. It is not meant to convey the Firm’s legal position on behalf of any client, nor is it intended to convey specific legal advice. Any opinions expressed in this article do not necessarily reflect the views of Foley & Lardner LLP, its partners, or its clients. Accordingly, do not act upon this information without seeking counsel from a licensed attorney. This blog is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship. Communicating with Foley through this website by email, blog post, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship for any legal matter. Therefore, any communication or material you transmit to Foley through this blog, whether by email, blog post or any other manner, will not be treated as confidential or proprietary. The information on this blog is published “AS IS” and is not guaranteed to be complete, accurate, and or up-to-date. Foley makes no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, as to the operation or content of the site. Foley expressly disclaims all other guarantees, warranties, conditions and representations of any kind, either express or implied, whether arising under any statute, law, commercial use or otherwise, including implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Foley or any of its partners, officers, employees, agents or affiliates be liable, directly or indirectly, under any theory of law (contract, tort, negligence or otherwise), to you or anyone else, for any claims, losses or damages, direct, indirect special, incidental, punitive or consequential, resulting from or occasioned by the creation, use of or reliance on this site (including information and other content) or any third party websites or the information, resources or material accessed through any such websites. In some jurisdictions, the contents of this blog may be considered Attorney Advertising. If applicable, please note that prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Photographs are for dramatization purposes only and may include models. Likenesses do not necessarily imply current client, partnership or employee status.

Related Services

Insights

RCE PTA Carve-Out Resumes After Interference
18 September 2019
PharmaPatents
The Ninth Circuit Expected to Rule that Doctors Can Be Wrong in the Winter v. Gardens False Claims Act Case
18 September 2019
Legal News: Government Enforcement Defense & Investigations
Upcoming Webinar: Maximizing Solar Tax Credits - Navigating the Start of Construction Rules (Part 1)
17 September 2019
Renewable Energy Outlook
When Birds Finally Find a Nest
17 September 2019
Dashboard Insights
Lacktman, Ferrante Cited in mHealth Intelligence About Ryan Haight Act
19 September 2019
mHealth Intelligence
Tinnen Discusses How Viewpoint Diversity Helps Businesses Thrive
18 September 2019
InsideTrack
Vernaglia Comments on AHA v Azar Decision
18 September 2019
MedPage Today
Lach Comments on Launch of New Group
16 September 2019
BizTimes Milwaukee
MedTech Impact Expo & Conference
13-15 December 2019
Las Vegas, NV
Review of 2020 Medicare Changes for Telehealth
11 December 2019
Member Call
BRG Healthcare Leadership Conference
06 December 2019
Washington, D.C.
CTeL Telehealth Fall Summit 2019
04-06 December 2019
Washington, D.C.