Will Other Tech Companies Join Microsoft in Honoring CCPA Across the U.S.?

18 November 2019 Internet, IT & e-Discovery Blog Blog
Authors: Peter Vogel

HelpNetSecurity.com reported that Julie Brill (Microsoft chief privacy officer) said “Under CCPA, companies must be transparent about data collection and use, and provide people with the option to prevent their personal information from being sold. Exactly what will be required under CCPA to accomplish these goals is still developing. Microsoft will continue to monitor those changes, and make the adjustments needed to provide effective transparency and control under CCPA to all people in the U.S…” The November 13, 2019 article entitled “Microsoft to honor California’s digital privacy law all through the U.S.” included these comments from Emily Wilson (VP of Research at digital risk protection provider Terbium Labs):

...that this move illustrates just how much Microsoft sees the writing on the wall, as do the other tech giants in the space – either they can embrace the overarching and detailed California legislation, or they can attempt to push for a national standard.

While pushing for a national standard may sound like an easier path to compliance (a unified set of requirements, rather than needing to make adjustments on a state-by-state basis), tech giants are also hoping that the process of creating a national framework will be a slow and tedious process, ultimately resulting in legislation that is less stringent in its requirements,

Organizations have no inherent incentive to limit their data collection practices or provide consumers with increased privacy; the data economy is lucrative, and the more companies can collect and analyze, the greater their competitive advantage and potential profit.

Microsoft choosing to lean in on CCPA is likely to be an outlier amongst the other major tech companies who would rather bide their time, and certainly an outlier among smaller enterprise organizations.

What do you think?

This blog is made available by Foley & Lardner LLP (“Foley” or “the Firm”) for informational purposes only. It is not meant to convey the Firm’s legal position on behalf of any client, nor is it intended to convey specific legal advice. Any opinions expressed in this article do not necessarily reflect the views of Foley & Lardner LLP, its partners, or its clients. Accordingly, do not act upon this information without seeking counsel from a licensed attorney. This blog is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship. Communicating with Foley through this website by email, blog post, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship for any legal matter. Therefore, any communication or material you transmit to Foley through this blog, whether by email, blog post or any other manner, will not be treated as confidential or proprietary. The information on this blog is published “AS IS” and is not guaranteed to be complete, accurate, and or up-to-date. Foley makes no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, as to the operation or content of the site. Foley expressly disclaims all other guarantees, warranties, conditions and representations of any kind, either express or implied, whether arising under any statute, law, commercial use or otherwise, including implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Foley or any of its partners, officers, employees, agents or affiliates be liable, directly or indirectly, under any theory of law (contract, tort, negligence or otherwise), to you or anyone else, for any claims, losses or damages, direct, indirect special, incidental, punitive or consequential, resulting from or occasioned by the creation, use of or reliance on this site (including information and other content) or any third party websites or the information, resources or material accessed through any such websites. In some jurisdictions, the contents of this blog may be considered Attorney Advertising. If applicable, please note that prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Photographs are for dramatization purposes only and may include models. Likenesses do not necessarily imply current client, partnership or employee status.