Consumer Product Safety Commission Remains Open for Business and Vigilant During the Coronavirus

30 March 2020 Coronavirus Resource Center Blog
Authors: Erik K. Swanholt Nicholas R. Johnson

The U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) may be working from home but its activity and enforcement efforts remain as energized as ever. The Agency's critical vigilance during the COVID-19 crisis, including its focus on counterfeit COVID-19 products flooding the market place.  On March 23, the agency tweeted that its staff are teleworking “to the maximum extent possible” and still coordinating product recalls.  The agency also highlighted recent efforts by U.S. Customs and Border Patrol to seize altered and prohibited cleaning products and fake COVID-19 treatment kits and continues to publicize the dangers of counterfeit goods.

The agency’s commitment to working hard during this time of “sheltering in place” and “social distancing” is consistent with the more aggressive stance that the CPSC has recently taken against products that it believes pose safety hazards, including tougher penalties and increased use of “unilateral” press releases for companies whose products the CPSC believes pose serious safety risks.    

This approach is also likely in response to recent criticism that the agency has not been active or punitive enough.  Under outgoing CPSC Chair, Ann Marie Buerkle, product recalls fell to their lowest point in 16 years, and the number of companies facing civil penalties fell too (from 6 in 2016 to 0 in 2019). More recently, the CPSC has faced criticism on grounds that it failed to act quickly or aggressively enough to address a rash of fatal tipover incidents involving children’s furniture.  

The recent trend of “unilateral” press releases issued by the CPSC marks a return to increased enforcement efforts.  Although the CPSC has the authority to file a lawsuit to compel a company to conduct a recall, the agency’s longstanding preference is to make a joint recall announcement (via official press release) with the affected company after CPSC staff have vetted the company’s proposed remedy.  And in the rare case of a forced recall lawsuit, a settlement often ensues that permits the company to avoid the recall. 

In the CPSC’s infancy in the 1970s, the agency often issued press releases warning of hazards even if the company disagreed with the need for a recall (hence the “unilateral” moniker) but since then, the practice had been little used – until Commissioner, Robert Adler, became acting Chair on October 1, 2019.  Since that time, the CPSC has issued three unilateral press releases – one warning of dresser tipover hazards, one warning of suffocation risks posed by infant inclined sleepers, and one warning of fire risks associated with hoverboards.  In each case, the press release made clear that the CPSC disapproved of the company’s decision not to recall the product (in the case of the hoverboard product, for example, the CPSC stated that the company “refused” to make a recall). 

These unilateral press releases are notable for several reasons.  First, the variety of products and hazards involved suggest that the newly invigorated CPSC does not intend to focus its enforcement attention on one particular product or industry.  Second, a unilateral announcement puts enormous pressure on a company to conduct a recall, since the court of public opinion rarely acquits a company facing harsh scrutiny from presumptively neutral regulators.  Third, the CPSC may seek civil penalties of up to $15 million for any related series of violations – an amount that Chairman Adler once called a “rounding error” for many of the multi-billion-dollar companies the CPSC regulates.  

As a result of all this, it is important that companies not overlook potential product compliance issues, even as they scramble to adjust to new and unexpected COVID-19 realities.  Indeed, the crisis may itself generate new risks.  For example, if your company has to substitute suppliers on an interim basis because your primary suppliers are experiencing COVID-19 related delays, the exigency of the situation should not excuse the need to obtain from the interim suppliers representations of compliance, including supporting documentation, for products subject to CPSC jurisdiction.  It is likewise still important to review substitute and interim supply contracts to ensure that product compliance and liability risks are appropriately allocated.  Finally, companies should review their internal product safety and hazard evaluation, compliance, and reporting programs to ensure that backup protocols are in place in case a key content owner is out of the office for an extended period of time.

Foley has extensive experience designing and augmenting product safety and compliance programs across a wide variety of industries.  We would be happy to review your company’s existing plans in light of COVID-19 exigencies and advise on next steps. For more information, please contact your Foley relationship partner.

For additional web-based resources available to assist you in monitoring the spread of the coronavirus on a global basis, you may wish to visit the CDC and the World Health Organization

Foley has created a multi-disciplinary and multi-jurisdictional team, which has prepared a wealth of topical client resources and is prepared to help our clients meet the legal and business challenges that the coronavirus outbreak is creating for stakeholders across a range of industries. Click here for Foley’s Coronavirus Resource Center to stay apprised of relevant developments, insights and resources to support your business during this challenging time. To receive this content directly in your inbox, click here and submit the form. To view Foley’s summary of the complete CARES Act, click here

This blog is made available by Foley & Lardner LLP (“Foley” or “the Firm”) for informational purposes only. It is not meant to convey the Firm’s legal position on behalf of any client, nor is it intended to convey specific legal advice. Any opinions expressed in this article do not necessarily reflect the views of Foley & Lardner LLP, its partners, or its clients. Accordingly, do not act upon this information without seeking counsel from a licensed attorney. This blog is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship. Communicating with Foley through this website by email, blog post, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship for any legal matter. Therefore, any communication or material you transmit to Foley through this blog, whether by email, blog post or any other manner, will not be treated as confidential or proprietary. The information on this blog is published “AS IS” and is not guaranteed to be complete, accurate, and or up-to-date. Foley makes no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, as to the operation or content of the site. Foley expressly disclaims all other guarantees, warranties, conditions and representations of any kind, either express or implied, whether arising under any statute, law, commercial use or otherwise, including implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Foley or any of its partners, officers, employees, agents or affiliates be liable, directly or indirectly, under any theory of law (contract, tort, negligence or otherwise), to you or anyone else, for any claims, losses or damages, direct, indirect special, incidental, punitive or consequential, resulting from or occasioned by the creation, use of or reliance on this site (including information and other content) or any third party websites or the information, resources or material accessed through any such websites. In some jurisdictions, the contents of this blog may be considered Attorney Advertising. If applicable, please note that prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Photographs are for dramatization purposes only and may include models. Likenesses do not necessarily imply current client, partnership or employee status.

Related Services

Insights