AI in the Courtroom to predict RNAs (Risk and Needs Assessment) for offenders!

19 May 2021 Internet, IT & e-Discovery Blog Blog
Authors: Peter Vogel

Judge Xavier Rodriquez wrote a book review about AI in court in the book "When Machines Can Be Judge, Jury, and Executioner: Justice in the Age of Artificial Intelligence," written by former US District Judge Katherine Bolan Forrest which “addresses the growing use of artificial intelligence tools that augment or potentially displace human judgment. In specific, she focuses on AI assessment tools that are used to predict risk and needs assessments, or RNAs, for offenders.”  The May 18, 2021 book review entitled “Judging A Book: Rodriguez Reviews 'When Machines Can Be Judge'” included these comments:

These RNA tools are often used to guide judicial decisions on whether to grant a criminal defendant bail or remand, and the duration and conditions of a defendant's incarceration.

Forrest's prior service as a judge, her interest in technology, and her easy-to-read writing style makes for an interesting and understandable introduction to AI as it is currently used in the criminal justice process.

Forrest concludes her book with a discussion of how AI has been deployed in lethal autonomous weapons used by our military forces.

In an approving tone, she notes that these weapons can result in increased identification accuracy, allow for dispassionate decision making, and enable quick decisions about whether to engage a target.

Interesting perspective on AI in the Courtroom!

This blog is made available by Foley & Lardner LLP (“Foley” or “the Firm”) for informational purposes only. It is not meant to convey the Firm’s legal position on behalf of any client, nor is it intended to convey specific legal advice. Any opinions expressed in this article do not necessarily reflect the views of Foley & Lardner LLP, its partners, or its clients. Accordingly, do not act upon this information without seeking counsel from a licensed attorney. This blog is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship. Communicating with Foley through this website by email, blog post, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship for any legal matter. Therefore, any communication or material you transmit to Foley through this blog, whether by email, blog post or any other manner, will not be treated as confidential or proprietary. The information on this blog is published “AS IS” and is not guaranteed to be complete, accurate, and or up-to-date. Foley makes no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, as to the operation or content of the site. Foley expressly disclaims all other guarantees, warranties, conditions and representations of any kind, either express or implied, whether arising under any statute, law, commercial use or otherwise, including implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Foley or any of its partners, officers, employees, agents or affiliates be liable, directly or indirectly, under any theory of law (contract, tort, negligence or otherwise), to you or anyone else, for any claims, losses or damages, direct, indirect special, incidental, punitive or consequential, resulting from or occasioned by the creation, use of or reliance on this site (including information and other content) or any third party websites or the information, resources or material accessed through any such websites. In some jurisdictions, the contents of this blog may be considered Attorney Advertising. If applicable, please note that prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Photographs are for dramatization purposes only and may include models. Likenesses do not necessarily imply current client, partnership or employee status.

Authors