Cyberinsurance exclusions for State-Backed Cyberattacks!

23 August 2022 Internet, IT & e-Discovery Blog Blog

My good friend Judy Greenwald reported for that “Lloyd’s of London will require standalone cyber policies to include state-backed cyberattack exclusions beginning in March 2023, it said in a market bulletin this week.”  The August 18, 2022 article entitled “Lloyd’s requiring state-backed cyberattack exclusions” included these comments from my friend Judy Shelby (partner with Kennedys Law LLP in New York):

…”the big takeaway” here is that “there’s been a lot of focus over the last few months particularly with regard to cyber war, and the bulletin makes clear that the focus should be on state-backed attacks, whether in the context of war, or non-war situations.” 

Also the article included comments that “Lloyd’s said in Tuesday’s bulletin that in addition to any war exclusion, new or renewed standalone cyber policies should”:

- Exclude losses arising from a war, whether declared or not where the policies do not have a separate war exclusion;

- Be clear as to whether the cover excludes computer systems that are located outside any state affected by the state-backed cyberattack;

-Subject to the former requirement, exclude losses arising from state cyberattacks that significantly impair a state’s ability to function or its security liabilities.

- Set out on a “robust” basis the parties’ agreement;

- Ensure all key terms are clearly defined.

How does this impact you?

This blog is made available by Foley & Lardner LLP (“Foley” or “the Firm”) for informational purposes only. It is not meant to convey the Firm’s legal position on behalf of any client, nor is it intended to convey specific legal advice. Any opinions expressed in this article do not necessarily reflect the views of Foley & Lardner LLP, its partners, or its clients. Accordingly, do not act upon this information without seeking counsel from a licensed attorney. This blog is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship. Communicating with Foley through this website by email, blog post, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship for any legal matter. Therefore, any communication or material you transmit to Foley through this blog, whether by email, blog post or any other manner, will not be treated as confidential or proprietary. The information on this blog is published “AS IS” and is not guaranteed to be complete, accurate, and or up-to-date. Foley makes no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, as to the operation or content of the site. Foley expressly disclaims all other guarantees, warranties, conditions and representations of any kind, either express or implied, whether arising under any statute, law, commercial use or otherwise, including implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Foley or any of its partners, officers, employees, agents or affiliates be liable, directly or indirectly, under any theory of law (contract, tort, negligence or otherwise), to you or anyone else, for any claims, losses or damages, direct, indirect special, incidental, punitive or consequential, resulting from or occasioned by the creation, use of or reliance on this site (including information and other content) or any third party websites or the information, resources or material accessed through any such websites. In some jurisdictions, the contents of this blog may be considered Attorney Advertising. If applicable, please note that prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Photographs are for dramatization purposes only and may include models. Likenesses do not necessarily imply current client, partnership or employee status.