Written Descriptions: How Much is Enough? Court Will Revisit Ariad Case to Clarify the Amount of Disclosure Necessary in Patents
February 1, 2010
Foley Partner Courtenay Brinckerhoff authored an article titled, “Written Descriptions: How Much is Enough? Court Will Revisit Ariad Case to Clarify the Amount of Disclosure Necessary in Patents” in the Genetic Engineering & Biotechnology News. Brinckerhoff discusses the Federal Circuit’s decision to rehear Ariad Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Eli Lilly & Co. en banc to resolve an intra-court split over whether 35 USC § 112 imposes a written-description requirement that is separate from the enablement requirement. She reviews how the outcome of the case could have significant impact on biotechnology patents, which are often vulnerable to written-description challenges.
Author(s)
Related Insights
December 24, 2025
Health Care Law Today
Gender-Affirming Care: Multi‑State Lawsuit Challenges HHS Declaration
As previously discussed in Foley’s healthcarelawtoday, on December 18, 2025, the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services (HHS) held a press conference focused on what it defined as “sex rejection procedures” (SRPs), also known as gender-affirming care (GAC) for minors, and outlined next steps.
December 23, 2025
Energy Current
FERC Opens New Paths for Co-Located Loads in PJM: What Data Center and Power Generation Developers Need to Know
Key Takeaways FERC has ordered PJM to overhaul its tariff framework for co-located generation and large loads, finding existing rules…
December 23, 2025
Foley Viewpoints
The Rush to Exit: PE Firms Pick Up the Pace in 2025
Key Points: PE firms are moving to sell portfolio companies on an accelerated timeline in 2025 after years of much longer hold…