Is Hospital Care at Home Here to Stay?

21 March 2022 Health Care Law Today Blog
Author(s): Kara Sweet Lawrence W. Vernaglia Rachel B. Goodman

It has been almost two years since the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) first issued blanket waivers of certain hospital conditions of participation allowing healthcare systems and hospitals to provide hospital services in locations beyond their existing walls during the COVID-19 Public Health Emergency (PHE). At the end of 2020, CMS also began accepting waiver requests to waive 42 C.F.R §§ 482.23(b), (b)(1), which requires nursing services to be provided on a hospital’s premises 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, and the immediate availability of a registered nurse for care of any patient – thereby, permitting hospitals to implement Acute Hospital Care at Home programs during the PHE.

On March 10, 2022, Senators Tom Carper (D-Del.) and Tim Scott (R-S.C.) introduced the bipartisan legislation, “Hospital Inpatient Services Modernization Act” (S.3792) (the Act) that would extend CMS’ Acute Hospital Care at Home waiver flexibilities for an additional two years after the PHE expires.  Representatives Earl Blumenauer (D-Ore.) and Brad Wenstrup, DPM (R-Ohio) introduced the companion legislation in the House (H.R. 7053).

The Act, as introduced, would allow hospitals within CMS’ Acute Hospital Care at Home program to continue providing inpatient services in patients’ homes by:

(1) Allowing the 24/7 nursing services condition of participation to be satisfied by providing virtual access to nurses, advanced practice providers, or physicians, 24-hours per day; and

(2) Deeming life safety code requirements satisfied for homes or temporary residences determined to be safe and appropriate by the Acute Hospital Care at Home Program.

If the Act passes in similar form as introduced, within 12 months of being signed into law (not until the midway point of the extension itself), the Secretary of Health and Human Services (Secretary) is required to issue regulations establishing health and safety requirements for Acute Hospital Care at Home programs.

Additionally, the Act requires the Secretary, within 90 days of enactment of the bill, to submit a waiver evaluation report along with any associated recommendations for legislation and administrative actions to Congress. The evaluation must include reviewing Acute Hospital Care at Home and Hospital Without Walls waivers by looking at the relevant data collected by CMS related to those waivers and the quality of care provided, patient outcomes, beneficiary access, health disparities, patient safety, cost, and utilization. 

While the Act has received broad support from the provider community, it may not go far enough to help Medicare beneficiaries receive more accessible treatment in their homes. First, there may be additional state law barriers that influence whether hospitals can utilize the Acute Hospital Care at Home programs after the PHE ends since states often have regulations similar to CMS’ conditions of participation that may similarly need to be waived to not conflict with state hospital licensure laws. Second, this Act only extends the availability of inpatient hospital services, which is important since even with the recently enacted Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2022, which would extend the availability to provide and bill Medicare for telehealth services for patients in the home for 151 days post PHE, there could be barriers for patients continuing to receive care in the home once they no longer justify inpatient admission. Third, some critics may note that a two-year waiver is not long enough to understand or see the effectiveness of this Program, rather a five or seven-year waiver would allow for more evaluation time and additional time to create and implement regulations.

Foley is here to help you address the short- and long-term impacts in the wake of regulatory changes. We have the resources to help you navigate these and other important legal considerations related to business operations and industry-specific issues. Please reach out to the authors, your Foley relationship partner, or to our Health Care Practice Group with any questions.

This blog is made available by Foley & Lardner LLP (“Foley” or “the Firm”) for informational purposes only. It is not meant to convey the Firm’s legal position on behalf of any client, nor is it intended to convey specific legal advice. Any opinions expressed in this article do not necessarily reflect the views of Foley & Lardner LLP, its partners, or its clients. Accordingly, do not act upon this information without seeking counsel from a licensed attorney. This blog is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship. Communicating with Foley through this website by email, blog post, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship for any legal matter. Therefore, any communication or material you transmit to Foley through this blog, whether by email, blog post or any other manner, will not be treated as confidential or proprietary. The information on this blog is published “AS IS” and is not guaranteed to be complete, accurate, and or up-to-date. Foley makes no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, as to the operation or content of the site. Foley expressly disclaims all other guarantees, warranties, conditions and representations of any kind, either express or implied, whether arising under any statute, law, commercial use or otherwise, including implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Foley or any of its partners, officers, employees, agents or affiliates be liable, directly or indirectly, under any theory of law (contract, tort, negligence or otherwise), to you or anyone else, for any claims, losses or damages, direct, indirect special, incidental, punitive or consequential, resulting from or occasioned by the creation, use of or reliance on this site (including information and other content) or any third party websites or the information, resources or material accessed through any such websites. In some jurisdictions, the contents of this blog may be considered Attorney Advertising. If applicable, please note that prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Photographs are for dramatization purposes only and may include models. Likenesses do not necessarily imply current client, partnership or employee status.

Insights