Of Counsel Thomas Mullooly was quoted in a Washington Post article, “The Electricity Innovation So Controversial That it’s Now Before the Supreme Court,” on October 20, 2015. The article discussed the oral arguments from Supreme Court case Federal Energy Regulatory Commission v. Electric Power Supply Association. The case examined “demand response,” which is the method of providing energy during high demand periods, and a product that demand response companies often utilize, “negawatts.” Mullooly was quoted saying, “Our electric consumers are getting more sophisticated, more concerned about costs, and this is one of the tools that they’ve had to move into wholesale markets in a way that they perceive as being of economic benefit to them.”
People
Related News
17 April 2024
In the News
Steven Barth on Allure of Take-Private Deals – 'Public markets aren’t what they’re cracked up to be'
Foley & Lardner LLP partner Steven Barth offers extensive insight on the growing trend of family-owned consumer and retail businesses aiming to go private in the Axios article, “Family-owned companies see allure in take-private deals.”
17 April 2024
In the News
Christopher Ward on Federal Arbitration Act – ‘It matters what a worker does’
Foley & Lardner LLP partner Christopher Ward is quoted in the Law360 article, “Airplane Servicers Nod to Justices, Reiterate That Fueling Isn't Interstate Work.”
17 April 2024
In the News
Carrie Hoffman Assesses Ninth Circuit Ruling in Federal Arbitration Exemption Case
Foley & Lardner LLP partner Carrie Hoffman is quoted in the Law360 article, “Bright Line On Arbitration Seen As Risk To Workers' Right.”