Although the Supreme Court has recently increased its review of patent laws, the rulings have only eliminated deviations and reinforced precedent. However, the implications for nutraceutical companies is that their patent applications would have to represent a true invention and be very precise, rather than being a collection of scientific facts or trivial improvements. In his byline on www.nutraingredients-usa.com, Foley’s John Garvey discusses three recent cases reviewed by the Supreme Court and the impact of these decisions on dietary supplement and functional foods companies looking to patent their technologies.
Related Insights
January 16, 2026
Energy Current
Fifth Circuit Clears Path for Texas LNG Brownsville Terminal Construction
The Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals on January 14, 2026 overruled the petition of the South Texas Environmental Justice Network (STEJN)…
January 16, 2026
Innovative Technology Insights
Crypto Exits Surge in 2025: Momentum Builds for an Even Bigger 2026
After more than a decade of speculation about when digital‑asset companies would finally break into the public markets at scale, 2025 delivered the long‑awaited breakthrough. Crypto‑related businesses didn’t merely test market appetite—they validated it.
January 15, 2026
The Path & The Practice
Special Episode: Alexis Robertson and Dan Sharpe talk advice to new Big Law associates
In this special edition of The Path & The Practice, Alexis is joined by Dan Sharpe, DEI Manager at Foley & Lardner, for a conversation focused on advice to new associates. Based on their years of legal practice and their experience working in law firm talent development and DEI, they cover a variety of topics including time entry, meeting deadlines, responsiveness, and office presence.