On April 15, 2013, the Supreme Court will hear oral arguments in the Myriad Genetics v. Association for Molecular Pathology litigation. The patent world is watching, particularly those who focus on emerging technologies. On March 14, 2013, the NanoBusiness Commercialization Association filed a brief in support of Myriad Genetics (brief prepared by Foley & Lardner, LLP). In addition to arguing that the patent claims should be patent eligible, which is the essence of the case, the brief also argues that patents do not preempt others from experimenting on, improving upon, or designing around a patented invention. With today being the first day of the new first-to-file regime, patent lawyers of all stripes are busy these days keeping up with dramatic changes to the patent system. The Supreme Court could use the Myriad case to establish a new paradigm for patent eligibility. Stay tuned.
Perspectives connexes
December 12, 2025
Health Care Law Today
Eleventh Circuit Hears Oral Argument in Landmark Constitutional Challenge to False Claims Act’s Qui Tam Provisions
On December 12, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit heard oral argument in U.S. ex rel. Zafirov v. Florida Medical…
11 décembre 2025
Points de vue de Foley
Risques antitrust et stratégies de conformité dans la gestion de portefeuilles de propriété intellectuelle
Cet article analyse comment la gestion du portefeuille de propriété intellectuelle peut à la fois promouvoir l'innovation et présenter un potentiel...
11 décembre 2025
Points de vue de Foley
Le CARB publie les projets de réglementation pour les lois SB 261 et 253
Le 9 décembre 2025, le California Air Resources Board (CARB) a publié son projet de texte réglementaire pour les premières réglementations...