Senior Counsel Alissa Nann contributed an article to Law360 on March 4, 2016, “How Will the High Court Define ‘Actual Fraud’?” In the article, Nann discussed the Supreme Court case, Husky International Electronics v. Ritz, in which the court will decide whether the discharge exception for “actual fraud” requires the debtor to have made a false representation to the creditor. Nann provided insights on the oral arguments of case and offered two main takeaways.
Author(s)
Related Insights
December 24, 2025
Health Care Law Today
Gender-Affirming Care: Multi‑State Lawsuit Challenges HHS Declaration
As previously discussed in Foley’s healthcarelawtoday, on December 18, 2025, the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services (HHS) held a press conference focused on what it defined as “sex rejection procedures” (SRPs), also known as gender-affirming care (GAC) for minors, and outlined next steps.
December 23, 2025
Energy Current
FERC Opens New Paths for Co-Located Loads in PJM: What Data Center and Power Generation Developers Need to Know
Key Takeaways FERC has ordered PJM to overhaul its tariff framework for co-located generation and large loads, finding existing rules…
December 23, 2025
Foley Viewpoints
The Rush to Exit: PE Firms Pick Up the Pace in 2025
Key Points: PE firms are moving to sell portfolio companies on an accelerated timeline in 2025 after years of much longer hold…