Attorneys Leah Eisenberg and Katherine Catanese co-authored an article with Arent Fox attorney Sam Lawand for the Review of Banking & Financial Services. Titled “Arbitration and Bankruptcy: A Tug of War,” the attorneys first cover how FAA pro-arbitration policies conflict with the Bankruptcy Code, then transition into the interplay between the statutory regimes for “non-core” and “core” bankruptcy matters, and finally conclude that court standards and analyses are highly dependent on the facts of their respective cases.
Read the full article via the link below.
This article was also circulated in the Daily Bankruptcy News newsletter’s August 18, 2017 edition.
Author(s)
Related Insights
16 May 2024
Events
You Be the Judge: Top Staffing Cases of 2023
Back by popular demand—combining value with a bit of levity: This interactive session features leading legal experts in staffing who will argue their cases before you, the jury, and let you decide the verdict.
27 March 2024
PharmaPatents
Federal Circuit Applies Safe Harbor to Imported Medical Device Samples
In a recent decision, a majority panel of the Federal Circuit held that the importation of medical devices to support efforts to recruit investigators for a clinical trial was shielded by the safe harbor.
27 March 2024
Legal News: Distribution & Franchise
Federal Court Analyzes Venue Statutes and Orders Transfer of Suit Against Franchisee
In Honest Abe Roofing Franchise, Inc. v. Lesjon Holdings, LLC, the District Court for the Southern District of Indiana ruled on a motion to dismiss for improper venue under Federal Rule 12(b)(3).