Texas Tackles Sexual Harassment by Placing Liability on Individual Members of Management

11 October 2021 Labor & Employment Law Perspectives Blog
Author(s): Rachel Powitzky Steely

Texas has taken aim at sexual harassment in the workplace.  In a bold move by the Texas legislature, a new sexual harassment law (effective September 1, 2021) expands the definition of sexual harassment, heightens the standard of an employer’s response to complaints, and places responsibility on individuals, rather than just companies, for failing to address sexual harassment.

Why the new harassment law is significant.

The new law makes sweeping changes to the definition of sexual harassment,  

as well as who can be liable for sexual harassment and a company’s obligations to prevent sexual harassment. It also increases the time an employee has to file a claim of sexual harassment with the Texas Workforce Commission.  Importantly, the law does not address harassment based on any other protected class, such as age, disability, or race.  The failure to add harassment based on other protected classes indicates the legislature was focused on the sex-based nature of workplace activity that precludes victims from advancing. 

Sexual harassment is now defined as any sexual physical or verbal act that “has the purpose or effect of creating an intimidating, hostile or offensive working environment.”  The inclusion of an “intimidating” working environment seems to lower the bar for harassment complainants.  

Directors, Managers, Supervisors and Other Individuals are now personally liable for sexual harassment.

Federal sexual harassment law has never extended liability to individuals. Instead, the federal law limits liability to business entities.  Under the Texas law, a “person that acts directly in the interest of the employer in relation to the employee” may be liable for failing to adequately address sexual harassment that “reasonably interferes with an employee’s work performance.”   Although these terms have not yet been defined, it is reasonable to expect that contractors, managers, and co-workers could be liable for failing to address sexual harassment.  

Individuals and business entities would likely be jointly and severally liable for sexual harassment damages in Texas. This means individuals face the same responsibility to pay for money damages as their employers.  The Texas Labor Code provides that compensatory damages (emotional distress and punitive damages) are awarded for “each complainant”, rather than each defendant, signaling a joint award.  Therefore, attorneys’ representing sexual harassment plaintiffs will not see additional damages for adding individuals to sexual harassment lawsuits but will likely have more leverage in discovery and at trial.   

Employees have a greater opportunity to complain.

The new law expands coverage to all business entities regardless of the number of employees, unlike the federal discrimination law threshold of fifteen employees.  And, Texas employees have longer to file a claim with the Texas Workforce Commission, now 300 days from the alleged act, which is 120 days longer than the limitation for other discrimination claims.  One question is whether the federal legal theory of a continuing violation will apply to the new Texas law. Under the continuing violation theory, employees can bring complaints for years of alleged harassing acts that would have otherwise been banned by limitations as long as one act occurs within the statutory 300 day period.  So, while the law may be effective only for acts occurring after September 1, 2021, companies still risk a resurgence of older complaints.

Liability for business entities and individuals may be easier under the new law.

In a nutshell, the Texas law has flipped the prior law on its head.  Under the new Texas law, liability attaches if sexual harassment has taken place and “the employer or the employer’s agents or supervisors: (1) know or should have known that the conduct constituting sexual harassment was occurring; and (2) fail to take immediate and appropriate corrective action.”  The new requirement is opposite of the prior law.  Under the prior law, an employer could avoid a sexual harassment claim by proving the company took “prompt remedial action” in response to the sexual harassment complaint.  The new law requires this action up front.  Also, the term “immediate and appropriate corrective action” is different from the prior “prompt remedial action” defense and indicates a heightened standard is required for employers.

Immediate steps Employers should take.

Given that the new sexual harassment law is already in effect, employers should act fast. First, training is a must.  The new standard of liability requires that employees and managers be able to identify sexual harassment and respond to such conduct immediately.  Online training portals and written training materials are available to reach employees working remotely or on shifts. Records of the materials used for training and confirmation of completed training should be preserved so that these documents can be used in the event of a charge or a lawsuit.   Managers and supervisors, as well as contractors dealing directly with employees, should be informed of the personally liability that now attaches to sexual harassment claims. Finally, investigations of complaints are now more important than ever.  Companies should provide training and procedures for effective investigations or promptly contact counsel or a third-party human resources consultant to assist with an investigation.  Proper documentation of an investigation is now a requirement to defend against sexual harassment claims in Texas.

Sexual harassment has been prohibited for many years and workplace culture has seen significant improvements due to sexual harassment laws and training.  Notwithstanding, the new Texas sexual harassment law emphasizes the zero tolerance mindset of the general public.  Employers should take heed and implement effective policies and training now to avoid liability for themselves and their employees in the future. 

This blog is made available by Foley & Lardner LLP (“Foley” or “the Firm”) for informational purposes only. It is not meant to convey the Firm’s legal position on behalf of any client, nor is it intended to convey specific legal advice. Any opinions expressed in this article do not necessarily reflect the views of Foley & Lardner LLP, its partners, or its clients. Accordingly, do not act upon this information without seeking counsel from a licensed attorney. This blog is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship. Communicating with Foley through this website by email, blog post, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship for any legal matter. Therefore, any communication or material you transmit to Foley through this blog, whether by email, blog post or any other manner, will not be treated as confidential or proprietary. The information on this blog is published “AS IS” and is not guaranteed to be complete, accurate, and or up-to-date. Foley makes no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, as to the operation or content of the site. Foley expressly disclaims all other guarantees, warranties, conditions and representations of any kind, either express or implied, whether arising under any statute, law, commercial use or otherwise, including implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Foley or any of its partners, officers, employees, agents or affiliates be liable, directly or indirectly, under any theory of law (contract, tort, negligence or otherwise), to you or anyone else, for any claims, losses or damages, direct, indirect special, incidental, punitive or consequential, resulting from or occasioned by the creation, use of or reliance on this site (including information and other content) or any third party websites or the information, resources or material accessed through any such websites. In some jurisdictions, the contents of this blog may be considered Attorney Advertising. If applicable, please note that prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Photographs are for dramatization purposes only and may include models. Likenesses do not necessarily imply current client, partnership or employee status.

Related Services


Ten Minute Interview: M&A Challenges & Opportunities
23 November 2022
Sujata “Sue” Sachdeva and Koss Corp.
23 November 2022
Cannabis Company Cops to SEC Accounting Fraud Charges
22 November 2022
Legal News: Cannabis Industry
Foley Automotive Report
22 November 2022
Dashboard Insights
CLE Weeks
5-16 December 2022
Milwaukee, WI
Foley Sponsors Ernst & Young Entrepreneur of the Year® Program
1 December 2021 - 30 November 2022
Michigan and Northwest Ohio Region
2022 Distressed Investing Conference
28 November 2022
New York, NY
Meet and Greet and Panel Discussion with E. Martin Estrada and Cuauhtemoc Ortega
28 November 2022
Los Angeles, CA