Breathe Easy: U.S. EPA Seeks to Significantly Tighten Fine Particulate Matter Standards | Blogs | Manufacturing Industry Advisor

On January 6, 2023, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) issued a proposed rule to lower the primary National Ambient Air Quality Standard (NAAQS) for fine/inhalable particulate matter (PM_2.5). These proposed standards were published in the Federal Register on January 27 triggering a 60-day public comment period that will end on March 28, 2023. EPA is proposing to lower the primary NAAQS PM_2.5 emission standard from 12 micrograms per cubic meter (µg/m3) to between nine and ten µg/m. The new standards, if issued as proposed, could result in many areas of the country being designated as nonattainment with the new standards, triggering significant new costs and control requirements for facilities with air permits in those new nonattainment areas.

The Clean Air Act provides for two types of NAAQS: (1) primary, and (2) secondary. The primary standards are health based and the secondary standards are meant to protect public welfare. The current primary PM_2.5 annual NAAQS standards were issued in 2012 and reevaluated and maintained by the prior administration in 2020. In 2021, EPA indicated that it planned to reconsider the 2020 decision to retain the standards. EPA is planning to retain the current primary 24-hour standard of 35 µg/m3 for PM_2.5 but is taking public comment on revising the level to as low as 25 µg/m3. The agency is also planning to retain the current primary 24-hour standard for PM₁₀ and the secondary standards for both PM_2.5and PM₁₀. In addition to proposing more stringent emission standards for PM_2.5, EPA is also proposing to revise other related requirements such as monitoring requirements and the Air Quality Index for PM_2.5. The changes have potentially sweeping implications. Like ozone, most PM_2.5 is not directly emitted from sources, but is instead formed from a reaction of gases in the atmosphere. PM_2.5 concentrations tend to vary relatively uniformly distributed over large areas.

On January 31, EPA provided notice that it will conduct virtual public hearings on the proposed rule on February 21 and February 22.

For additional information on the proposal and potential avenues for comment, or engagement with the agency, please contact Pete Tomasi or Amanda Beggs.

This blog is made available by Foley & Lardner LLP (“Foley” or “the Firm”) for informational purposes only. It is not meant to convey the Firm’s legal position on behalf of any client, nor is it intended to convey specific legal advice. Any opinions expressed in this article do not necessarily reflect the views of Foley & Lardner LLP, its partners, or its clients. Accordingly, do not act upon this information without seeking counsel from a licensed attorney. This blog is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship. Communicating with Foley through this website by email, blog post, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship for any legal matter. Therefore, any communication or material you transmit to Foley through this blog, whether by email, blog post or any other manner, will not be treated as confidential or proprietary. The information on this blog is published “AS IS” and is not guaranteed to be complete, accurate, and or up-to-date. Foley makes no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, as to the operation or content of the site. Foley expressly disclaims all other guarantees, warranties, conditions and representations of any kind, either express or implied, whether arising under any statute, law, commercial use or otherwise, including implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Foley or any of its partners, officers, employees, agents or affiliates be liable, directly or indirectly, under any theory of law (contract, tort, negligence or otherwise), to you or anyone else, for any claims, losses or damages, direct, indirect special, incidental, punitive or consequential, resulting from or occasioned by the creation, use of or reliance on this site (including information and other content) or any third party websites or the information, resources or material accessed through any such websites. In some jurisdictions, the contents of this blog may be considered Attorney Advertising. If applicable, please note that prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Photographs are for dramatization purposes only and may include models. Likenesses do not necessarily imply current client, partnership or employee status.