Partner Jonathan Moskin was quoted in a World Trademark Review article, “Iancu v. Brunetti ruling – trademark community has its say on implications of momentous US Supreme Court decision,” about a U.S. Supreme Court decision holding that a federal ban on immoral or scandalous trademarks violates the First Amendment.
While the decision means that Erik Brunetti, who has sought federal registration for the trademark “FUCT” in connection with a line of clothing, should now be able to register his claimed mark, Moskin said, he doubts many such marks or the products that bear them will ever attain wide commercial acceptance. “Mr. Brunetti’s chosen name for his streetwear brand may be a household word – but not because it adorns any of his goods and not because his goods will be found in many households,” he saidPeople
Related News
December 24, 2025
In the News
Kyle Faget on HHS Gender-Affirming Care Declaration – Impact is 'Enormous'
Foley & Lardner LLP partner Kyle Faget commented on the recent Department of Health and Human Services declaration rejecting gender-affirming care in the STAT News article, “Nineteen states, D.C. sue HHS over gender-affirming care crackdown."
December 22, 2025
In the News
Monica Call in Law.com Leadership Spotlight – 'I see my role as both coach and advocate'
Foley & Lardner LLP partner Monica Call reflects on leadership, mentorship, and strategy in Law.com's "How I Made It Office Managing Partner" series.
December 18, 2025
In the News
Kyle Faget Weighs in on HHS Proposed Rule Limiting Gender-Affirming Care
Foley & Lardner LLP partner Kyle Faget commented on a recent proposal from the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services in the Law360 article, “HHS Proposes Hospital Ban On Gender Care For Minors.”