Ethics Drama of 2007: Qualcomm, Congress and the Pressure to Waive Attorney Client Privilege
04 December 2007
The patent infringement lawsuit of Qualcomm v. Broadcom began innocuously and ended with a court order finding the plaintiff and its counsel knowingly violated a duty to disclosure, honesty, and good faith. The court found that conduct constituting discovery abuse exposed counsel to career imperiling orders, and the company to millions of dollars in sanctions. The company and its outside counsel each hired separate counsel, and in the resulting sanctions hearing attorney client privilege was threatened. Key leaders for Qualcomm including their General Counsel resigned. This session, presented by Kenneth S. Klein, Foley & Lardner LLP, explored how events came to this juncture, and what lessons can be learned to avoid it happening again.
Related Insights
18 April 2025
Foley Viewpoints
Supreme Court Ends Circuit Split with Ruling That Plaintiffs Can Seek RICO Damages for Certain Personal Injury Claims
The U.S. Supreme Court has broadened plaintiffs’ ability to sue under the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO) for economic loss stemming from personal injury.
30 April 2025
Events
Tariff Blitz Webinar
Join us for a wide-ranging discussion of the Trump administration tariffs and how to risk plan for them.
17 April 2025
Tariff & International Trade Resource
The Non-Compliant Cat in the Hat
So, just before Easter, in 1957, a little book you may have heard of, called The Cat in the Hat, made its first appearance. Theodore Geisel — writing under the name “Dr. Suess” — later said that of all his children’s books, he was proudest of this one, because “it had something to do with the death of the Dick and Jane primers,” which he thought would bore any child to tears.