The Supreme Court of the United States has made significant amendments to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 45, which became effective on December 1, 2013. Rule 45 governs the form, issuance, service, enforcement of, compliance with, and protection from, subpoenas in federal court. Due to the amendments to Rule 45, the Supreme Court has also made less extensive amendments to Rule 37, which addresses parties’ failure to cooperate in discovery and sanctions for such failures.
There are significant changes to Rule 45, a number of which are designed to streamline the process of issuing and serving subpoenas. However, the amendments also, among other changes, modify the procedures for bringing motions related to subpoenas and resolve conflicting case law with respect to the subpoena power of the federal courts over parties and their officers for testimony at trial.
Foley prepared a chart, available below, to assist those who find themselves involved with the subpoena process in civil cases in federal court — whether as a party or a subpoenaed person or entity — to navigate the changes by not only identifying the most significant provisions and changes, but also explaining the practical and strategic implications of these changes.
There are significant changes to Rule 45, a number of which are designed to streamline the process of issuing and serving subpoenas. However, the amendments also, among other changes, modify the procedures for bringing motions related to subpoenas and resolve conflicting case law with respect to the subpoena power of the federal courts over parties and their officers for testimony at trial.
Foley prepared a chart, available below, to assist those who find themselves involved with the subpoena process in civil cases in federal court — whether as a party or a subpoenaed person or entity — to navigate the changes by not only identifying the most significant provisions and changes, but also explaining the practical and strategic implications of these changes.
Author(s)
Related Insights
25 April 2025
Manufacturing Industry Advisor
Leaked Budget Proposal Suggests Major Restructuring of Federal Health and Safety Agencies, Including the Consumer Product Safety Commission
A recently leaked and apparently genuine Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Budget “Passback” memorandum—the OMB’s official feedback mechanism for budget submissions from federal agencies—signals major changes to the Department of Health and Human Services’ (HHS) proposed discretionary budget for Fiscal Year 2026.
24 April 2025
Foley Viewpoints
Prop 65: Changes to Short-Form Warnings Will Cause Long-Term Impacts
The California Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment recently amended its regulations concerning requirements for consumer product warnings to qualify for “safe harbor” protection from enforcement actions brought under the Safe Drinking Water and Toxic Enforcement Act of 1986, commonly known as Proposition 65.
24 April 2025
Tariff & International Trade Resource
What Every Multinational Company Should Know About … Customs Enforcement and False Claims Act Risks (Part II)
As detailed in Part I of our three-part series on Minimizing Customs Enforcement and False Claims Act Risks, the combination of the new high-tariff environment, the heightened ability of Customs (and the general public) to data mine, and the Department of Justice’s stated focus on using the False Claims Act substantially increases import-related risks.