As the first of a three-part series, partners David Ralston and Frank Murray published a Thomson Reuters Practical Law practice note, “Government Contracts: GAO Bid Protests,” which ran on January 3, 2017.
As prefaced in the article, the practice note describes the United States Government Accountability Office (GAO) bid protests that were filed by unhappy potential bidders, and discusses the benefits and disadvantages of GAO bid protests, compared to those with the United States Court of Federal Claims and at the agency level.
Read the full article through the below PDF.
As prefaced in the article, the practice note describes the United States Government Accountability Office (GAO) bid protests that were filed by unhappy potential bidders, and discusses the benefits and disadvantages of GAO bid protests, compared to those with the United States Court of Federal Claims and at the agency level.
Read the full article through the below PDF.
Author(s)
Related Insights
21 March 2025
IP Litigation Current
Federal Circuit Opens the Door to Additional Domestic Industry Investment: “Ordinary Importer” No Longer
In its recent decision in Lashify, Inc. v. International Trade Commission, the Federal Circuit opened the door for patent owners to include expanded categories of domestic investment to satisfy the economic prong of the domestic industry requirement under Section 337(a)(3)(B).
21 March 2025
Manufacturing Industry Advisor
Federal Court Rejects FCA’s “65%-100%” Language as Insufficient to Constitute the Necessary Quantity Term in a Requirements Contract—A Win for Suppliers
A recent federal court decision marks an important win for automotive suppliers in the ongoing debate over what constitutes a valid requirements contract under Michigan law following the Michigan Supreme Court’s decision in MSSN, Inc. v. Airboss Flexible Products Co. (2023).
27 April 2025
Events
Innovative Payment Strategies in Proton Therapy: Addressing Challenges and Driving Value
Foley partner Kinal Patel is speaking at the 2025 National Proton Conference in a panel titled “Innovative Payment Strategies in Proton Therapy: Addressing Challenges and Driving Value” on April 27.