How Calculating Damages Has Evolved in False Advertising and Product Defect Class Actions
27 April 2021
Partner Jai Singh along with additional reputable Intellectual Property experts will be presenting his views at the NERA Insights webinar titled “How Calculating Damages Has Evolved in False Advertising and Product Defect Class Actions” on Tuesday, 27 April at 11:00 a.m. PDT.
Jai will:
- Review damages methodology trends in false advertising and product defect class action litigation;
- Discuss recent trends in allegations, liability theories, and court decisions in these class actions; and,
- Analyze specific methodologies for calculating damages in the context of recent cases.
To find out more information on this complimentary webinar, please click here.
There is no charge for attending this event. To register, click here.
People
Related Insights
06 May 2024
Labor & Employment Law Perspectives
Update: Supreme Court Revises Title VII’s Decades-Old “Adverse Employment Action” Standard for Discriminatory Transfers
In January 2024, we reported on a significant case, Muldrow v. City of St. Louis, Missouri, No. 22-193, which was then pending before the United States Supreme Court. On April 17, 2024, the Court issued its decision in this case and, in doing so, modified the standard required to prove employment discrimination under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 with respect to job transfers.
06 May 2024
Labor & Employment Law Perspectives
EEOC’s New Harassment Enforcement Guidelines: A Good Primer for Addressing Workplace Harassment and Retaliation
On April 29, 2024, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission issued its long-awaited workplace harassment and enforcement guidelines to help employers understand what type of conduct the agency considered to be unlawful harassment.
06 May 2024
Article
Federal Court Protects Franchisor’s Rights Pursuant to Clear Terms of Franchise Agreement
In Bank United, NA v. GC of Vineland, LLC, Karen and William Scism and GC Vineland, LLC filed a complaint in the U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey against Golden Corral Corporation and Golden Corral Franchising Systems Inc.