Most employers are aware of, and comply with, the requirement to include information about employees’ rights and obligations under the Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA) in employee handbooks or other written policy documents. However, employers often fail to take advantage of the opportunity to use written FMLA policies as a way to combat FMLA abuse.
Below is a list of seven provisions that employers should include in their FMLA policies if they are searching for tools to help limit such abuse.
- Require that all leave requests be in writing. All employees should be required to document their request for leave on a written request form and return that form to Human Resources unless there are unusual circumstances that prevent the employee from doing so. Requiring written leave requests helps ensure there is no misunderstanding about the type of leave being requested or the dates or circumstances giving rise to the need for leave. Requiring employees to put the leave request in writing also can make an employee think twice before making a fraudulent leave request.
- Require that FMLA leaves run concurrently with other types of paid and unpaid leave and require employees to substitute paid leave for unpaid leave, unless prohibited by state or local law. Although concurrent running of leave and substitution of paid leave provisions are subject to state and local laws, they are strong deterrents when it comes to curbing FMLA abuse. When employees know that they will have to use up their available paid leave time (i.e., vacation, sick time, personal leave, and so on) when taking FMLA leave, they are much less likely to use FMLA leave for illegitimate reasons. Additionally, if they do take FMLA leave, requiring concurrent running of leave and substitution of paid leave (when permissible) prevents employees from taking 12 weeks of unpaid FMLA leave followed by additional weeks of paid vacation or other time off.
- Inform employees that medical certifications and recertifications will be required. FMLA policies should describe when medical certifications and recertifications will be required and employers should make sure to require those certifications and recertifications whenever possible (i.e., for new leave requests, when the reason for leave changes, when leave is extended, when a new leave year starts, when the leave circumstances change, if there is a pattern of suspicious absences, if there is objective information that provides a reason to doubt the need for leave, and so on).
- Mandate strict compliance with call-in procedures. The FMLA regulations are clear that employees must comply with an employer’s “usual and customary” notice and call-in procedures, absent unusual circumstances. For example, an employer’s call-in procedures may indicate how much advance notice is required when reporting an absence, to whom the absence must be reported, what information must be provided regarding the absence, etc. Employees who do not comply with such procedures, and who do not have a justifiable excuse for failing to comply, may have their leave requests delayed or denied, so long as the call-in requirements are uniformly applied for other types of absences.
- Prohibit secondary employment while on leave. The FMLA regulations permit employers to have policies prohibiting outside or supplemental employment while on leave, so long as the policy is uniformly applied to all types of leave, not just FMLA leave. Courts have dismissed FMLA claims filed by employees who were found to be working at another job in violation of the employer’s policy prohibiting other employment while on leave.
- Require employees to sign a certification regarding their absences. The FMLA prohibits employers from asking for a medical certification or doctor’s note in connection with every FMLA absence unless the documentation is required by policy in order to use paid leave time that is being substituted for unpaid FMLA leave. However, employers may require employees to sign a personal certification or acknowledgment following each absence which confirms that the employee took the day off for a FMLA or other medical reason and acknowledges that the employee may be disciplined or terminated for providing false information to the employer. To avoid any claim that employees using FMLA leave are treated differently from other employees, the personal certification/acknowledgment should be required from all employees returning from any kind of medical leave (e.g., FMLA, worker’s compensation, ADA, personal illness, and so on).
- Inform employees that second and third opinions may be required. Because second and third opinions are always obtained at the expense of the employer, second and third opinions are usually reserved for situations in which the request for leave is unclear or suspect for some reason (e.g., conflicting information has been provided regarding the reason for leave, the certifying health professional is not an expert in the field, the amount of leave requested appears to be inconsistent with the reason for leave, and so on). However, informing an employee up front that second or third opinions may be required puts employees on notice that suspicious leave requests will not automatically be approved by the employer.
By working with employment counsel to incorporate these provisions into existing FMLA policies, employers can ensure that they are taking full advantage of the tools available to limit fraudulent FMLA requests and FMLA abuse.
免責事項
このブログは、フォーリー&ラードナー法律事務所(「フォーリー」または「当事務所」)が情報提供のみを目的として公開しているものです。このブログは、クライアントのために当事務所の法的立場を伝えるものではなく、特定の法的助言を伝えるものでもありません。本記事で表明された意見は、必ずしもフォーリー&ラードナー法律事務所、そのパートナー、またはそのクライアントの見解を反映するものではありません。従って、資格を有する弁護士の助言を求めることなく、この情報に基づいて行動しないでください。このブログは、弁護士とクライアントの関係を構築することを意図したものではなく、またこのブログの受領は弁護士とクライアントの関係を構成するものでもありません。本ウェブサイトを通じて電子メール、ブログ記事、またはその他の方法でフォーリーと連絡を取ることは、いかなる法的問題に関しても弁護士とクライアントの関係を構築するものではありません。従って、電子メール、ブログ投稿、その他の方法を問わず、本ブログを通じてフォーリーに送信された通信または資料は、機密または専有物として扱われることはありません。本ブログの情報は「現状のまま」公開されており、完全性、正確性、最新性を保証するものではありません。フォーリーは、本サイトの運営または内容に関して、明示または黙示を問わず、いかなる種類の表明または保証も行いません。Foley は、法令、法律、商業的使用、その他に起因するか否かを問わず、商品性、特定目的への適合性、権原、非侵害の黙示的保証を含め、明示または黙示を問わず、その他のあらゆる保証、保証、条件、および表明を明示的に否認します。いかなる場合においても、フォーリーまたはそのパートナー、役員、従業員、代理人、関連会社は、直接的、間接的を問わず、法の理論(契約、不法行為、過失、その他)を問わず、本サイト(情報およびその他のコンテンツを含む)または第三者のウェブサイト、またはそのようなウェブサイトを通じてアクセスされた情報、リソース、資料の作成、使用、またはそれらに起因する、またはそれらに依存することによって生じる、直接的、間接的、特別、付随的、懲罰的、または結果的な請求、損失、または損害について、お客様または他の誰に対しても責任を負わないものとします。法域によっては、本ブログの内容が弁護士広告とみなされる場合があります。該当する場合、過去の結果が同様の結果を保証するものではないことにご注意ください。写真は演出のためのものであり、モデルが含まれている場合があります。似顔絵は必ずしも現在のクライアント、パートナーシップ、従業員の地位を意味するものではありません。
関連インサイト
December 12, 2025
Health Care Law Today
Eleventh Circuit Hears Oral Argument in Landmark Constitutional Challenge to False Claims Act’s Qui Tam Provisions
On December 12, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit heard oral argument in U.S. ex rel. Zafirov v. Florida Medical…
2025年12月11日
フォーリー・ビューポイント
知的財産ポートフォリオ管理における独占禁止法リスクとコンプライアンス戦略
本稿は、知的財産ポートフォリオ管理が、いかにしてイノベーションを促進すると同時に潜在的な…をもたらすかを分析する。
2025年12月11日
フォーリー・ビューポイント
カリフォルニア州大気資源局(CARB)、SB 261および253に関する規制案を発表
2025年12月9日、カリフォルニア州大気資源局(CARB)は、初期規制に関する規制案の草案を公開した…