Written Descriptions: How Much is Enough? Court Will Revisit Ariad Case to Clarify the Amount of Disclosure Necessary in Patents
February 1, 2010
Foley Partner Courtenay Brinckerhoff authored an article titled, “Written Descriptions: How Much is Enough? Court Will Revisit Ariad Case to Clarify the Amount of Disclosure Necessary in Patents” in the Genetic Engineering & Biotechnology News. Brinckerhoff discusses the Federal Circuit’s decision to rehear Ariad Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Eli Lilly & Co. en banc to resolve an intra-court split over whether 35 USC § 112 imposes a written-description requirement that is separate from the enablement requirement. She reviews how the outcome of the case could have significant impact on biotechnology patents, which are often vulnerable to written-description challenges.
Author(s)
Related Insights
December 22, 2025
Labor & Employment Law Perspectives
‘Tis the Season
‘Tis the Season… You probably do not think of HR compliance when you hear the phrase. But the end of 2025 is a good time — even in the…
January 27, 2026
Events
Fashion Law 2025 Year in Review
In 2025, the fashion industry faced significant challenges and opportunities driven by geopolitical shifts, rising tariffs and trade policy changes, and evolving consumer expectations, while innovation in brand protection and strategic partnerships supported resilience and growth.
December 22, 2025
Foley Viewpoints
Guyana: A Primer on a Strategic U.S. Caribbean & South American Ally
Guyana does not currently have a binding corporate governance code, and minority shareholder protections are relatively weak. Foreign investors must therefore structure joint ventures and other partnerships carefully, using shareholder agreements, board representation rights, and dispute resolution clauses to safeguard their interests.