The Ninth Circuit is at it again, blazing a different path than its sister circuits. In Sali v. Corona Regional Medical Center, the court reversed a district court’s order that denied class certification on the grounds that the sole evidence offered in support was a self-serving declaration that included unauthenticated documents and improper opinion testimony and was therefore inadmissible. In ruling that evidence offered in support of class certification need not be admissible at trial, the Ninth Circuit has arguably shown again why its reputation as one of the most plaintiff-friendly jurisdictions is well-deserved.
This article addresses (1) the Sali court’s analysis and holding; (2) how Sali directly conflicts with most other circuits; and (3) the impact this ruling is likely to have on class action defendants in the Ninth Circuit.
To read the full article, download the PDF below, or visit the original on Law360’s website.
This article addresses (1) the Sali court’s analysis and holding; (2) how Sali directly conflicts with most other circuits; and (3) the impact this ruling is likely to have on class action defendants in the Ninth Circuit.
To read the full article, download the PDF below, or visit the original on Law360’s website.
Author(s)
Related Insights
December 23, 2025
Energy Current
FERC Opens New Paths for Co-Located Loads in PJM: What Data Center and Power Generation Developers Need to Know
Key Takeaways FERC has ordered PJM to overhaul its tariff framework for co-located generation and large loads, finding existing rules…
December 23, 2025
Foley Viewpoints
The Rush to Exit: PE Firms Pick Up the Pace in 2025
Key Points: PE firms are moving to sell portfolio companies on an accelerated timeline in 2025 after years of much longer hold…
December 23, 2025
Tariff & International Trade Resource
Grandma Got Audited by a Reindeer
So…it’s Christmastime. Which can only mean it’s time for the Christmas tradition that everyone has been waiting for all year…our annual holiday compliance parody article!