This past week marked the one-month anniversary of the new Trump Administration, and there have been many developments — including in just the past week — to which employers need to pay attention.
- Secretary of Homeland Security revokes Temporary Protective Status (TPS) for Haitians and certain Venezuelans. The Secretary of Homeland Security may designate a foreign country for TPS due to conditions in the country’s that temporarily prevent the country’s nationals from returning safely. Currently, 17 countries have been granted TPS. Those granted TPS are entitled to work authorization (“EAD”). On February 1, 2025, Secretary of Homeland Security Kristi Noem decided to terminate TPS under the 2023 designation for Venezuela. If the termination stands, on April 7, 2025, a certain category of Venezuelans (approximately 350,000 people) previously granted TPS will lose status to remain in the U.S. And, on February 20, 2025, Secretary Noem revoked TPS for Haitian nationals (approximately 500,000 people) effective August 3, 2025. Unless revoked or blocked through court litigation, on the above dates, Venezuelans and Haitians here on TPS will lose their work authorization. Any employer who continues to employ a worker without valid work authorization can be subject to civil and criminal prosecution. It is possible workers from these two countries may have other legitimate bases, such a pending asylum petition, to remain in the country and remain employed. Employers who employ foreign nationals from these two countries should review each employee’s situation and determine strategies and/or options to keep them lawfully employed. In addition, employers should review their employees on TPS designation and stay vigilant other revocations in the weeks and months to come.
- NLRB’s Acting General Counsel Revokes Certain Memos Issued by his Predecessor. On February 14, 2025, National Labor Relation Board (NLRB or “Board”) Acting General Counsel William B. Cowen issued a memo revoking various memos issued over the past three years by then NLRB General Counsel Jennifer Abruzzo, whom President Trump fired shortly after taking office. The general counsel (GC) of the NLRB supervises the regional offices and plays a key role in directing enforcement and persuading the NLRB members on policy issues. Of the many memos rescinded were the prior memos calling for “full relief” (including various types of compensatory damages and not just back pay when violations were found) as well as a memo suggesting noncompetes violate workers’ rights and guidance about the NLRB’s decision Cemex Construction Materials Pacific, LLC, which made it more difficult for employers to avoid representation elections. The revocation of the prior memos indicates an immediate and dramatic shift away from the pro-employee and union positions of the prior GC and Board under the Biden Administration.
- President Trump Issues Executive Order requiring Independent Regulatory Agencies to Submit to Presidential Oversight. On February 18, 2025, President Trump issued an executive order entitled “Ensuring Accountability for All Agencies.” This order requires so-called independent agencies, such as the NLRB and perhaps the EEOC as well, to submit to more oversight from the White House on budgetary and regulatory matters and limits the legal positions they can take. Should this executive order stand the legal challenges that are likely to come, the president will be able to directly influence policy and enforcement activities more directly at these employment enforcement agencies.
- Acting EEOC Chair Seeks to Protect Workers From Anti-American Bias. Signaling another dramatic shift in enforcement priorities at an employment related government agency, on February 19, 2025, U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) Acting Chair Andrea Lucas announced “The EEOC is putting employers and other covered entities on notice: if you are part of the pipeline contributing to our immigration crisis or abusing our legal immigration system via illegal preferences against American workers, you must stop. The law applies to you, and you are not above the law. The EEOC is here to protect all workers from unlawful national origin discrimination, including American workers.”
- EEOC’s Final Rule Under the Pregnant Workers Fairness Act Under Attack. Acting Chair Lucas also issued a statement describing her opposition to certain parts of the Commission’s Final Rule implementing the Pregnant Workers Fairness Act (PWFA). The acting chair does not agree with the Commission’s interpretation of the phrase “pregnancy, childbirth, or related medical conditions” and the contrivances the Commission used to arrive at its construction of the statute. Related to this, on Thursday February 20, 2025, the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals issued a decision holding that attorneys general from 17 Republican-majority states have the right to sue the EEOC over the same PWFA rule, reviving their challenge to abortion-related components of the regulations.
Currently, both the NLRB and EEOC lack a sufficient quorum to enact any changes since President Trump fired members from both those agencies. It is clear that the Trump Administration will be issuing many more changes in enforcement strategy and implementing policies that will be directly affecting employers. Stay tuned!
면책 조항
이 블로그는 정보 제공의 목적으로만 Foley & Lardner LLP("Foley" 또는 "회사")에서 제공합니다. 고객을 대신하여 회사의 법적 입장을 전달하기 위한 것이 아니며 특정 법률 자문을 전달하기 위한 것도 아닙니다. 이 문서에 표현된 모든 의견이 반드시 Foley & Lardner LLP, 그 파트너 또는 고객의 견해를 반영하는 것은 아닙니다. 따라서 면허를 소지한 변호사의 조언 없이 이 정보에 따라 행동하지 마시기 바랍니다. 이 블로그는 변호사-고객 관계를 형성하기 위한 것이 아니며, 이 블로그를 수신한다고 해서 변호사-고객 관계가 성립되는 것도 아닙니다. 이 웹사이트를 통해 이메일, 블로그 게시물 또는 기타 방법으로 Foley와 소통하는 것은 어떠한 법적 문제에 대해서도 변호사-고객 관계를 형성하지 않습니다. 따라서 이 블로그를 통해 이메일, 블로그 게시물 또는 기타 방식으로 귀하가 Foley에게 전송하는 모든 커뮤니케이션 또는 자료는 기밀 또는 독점적인 것으로 취급되지 않습니다. 이 블로그의 정보는 "있는 그대로" 게시되며 완전성, 정확성, 최신성을 보장하지 않습니다. Foley는 사이트의 운영 또는 콘텐츠에 대해 명시적이든 묵시적이든 어떠한 종류의 진술이나 보증도 하지 않습니다. Foley는 상품성, 특정 목적에의 적합성, 소유권 및 비침해에 대한 묵시적 보증을 포함하여 법령, 법률, 상업적 사용 또는 기타에 따라 발생하는 모든 종류의 명시적 또는 묵시적 보증, 보증, 조건 및 진술을 명시적으로 부인합니다. 어떠한 경우에도 Foley 또는 그 파트너, 임원, 직원, 대리인 또는 계열사는 본 사이트(정보 및 기타 콘텐츠 포함) 또는 제3자 웹사이트 또는 그러한 웹사이트를 통해 액세스한 정보, 리소스 또는 자료의 생성, 사용 또는 의존으로 인해 발생하거나 그로 인해 발생하는 직접, 간접, 특별, 부수적, 징벌적 또는 결과적인 모든 청구, 손실 또는 손해에 대해 모든 법 이론(계약, 불법행위, 과실 또는 기타)에 따라 귀하 또는 다른 사람에게 직접 또는 간접적으로 책임지지 않습니다. 일부 관할권에서는 이 블로그의 콘텐츠가 변호사 광고로 간주될 수 있습니다. 해당되는 경우, 이전 결과가 유사한 결과를 보장하지 않는다는 점에 유의하시기 바랍니다. 사진은 극화 목적으로만 사용되었으며 모델이 포함될 수 있습니다. 유사성이 반드시 현재 고객, 파트너십 또는 직원 상태를 의미하지는 않습니다.
작성자(들)
관련 인사이트
December 8, 2025
Labor & Employment Law Perspectives
Colorado Adds New NICU Leave Under FAMLI: What Employers Should Know
Colorado’s Family and Medical Leave Insurance (FAMLI) program has provided employees with paid leave for major life events since 2024,…
December 8, 2025
Labor & Employment Law Perspectives
The Post-Shutdown Compliance Crunch: Preparing for Agency Action
The longest federal government shutdown in U.S. history has ended, and employers must now refocus their attention on agency actions and…
2025년 12월 5일
노동 및 고용법 관점
제9순회항소법원 판결, 노사관계위원회(NLRB) 활동 중단 속 근로자 발언권 인정
좋든 싫든, 소셜 미디어는 우리가 하는 거의 모든 일의 배경이 되었다. 많은 사람들이 뉴스를 읽고, 소통하고…