Understanding the Recent 6-3 Supreme Court Decision on Agency Deference
July 1, 2024
The recent 6-3 Supreme Court decision in the Loper Bright case overturns the 1984 “Chevron deference” precedent, rejecting the practice of federal courts deferring to governmental agencies on legal interpretations of ambiguous statutory language.
The impact of this ruling is significant as it shifts the balance of power between agencies and the judiciary in interpreting laws and deciding the best ways to apply them. Moving forward, federal courts are likely to engage in a more thorough review of agency interpretations, rule-making and actions.
- This decision, the Supreme Court’s ruling last week rejecting the SEC’s in-house enforcement of securities fraud claims, and the recent decision of the U.S. Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals to vacate the SEC’s Private Fund Adviser Rules, significantly limit the SEC’s reach over private fund advisers. However, this will likely not impact the SEC’s general focus on fiduciary considerations and the duty to disclose actual or potential conflicts of interest in their examinations, investigations, and enforcement sweeps of investment advisers.
The 6-3 decision, along ideological lines, discards a 1984 precedent directing federal courts to defer to agency legal interpretations when the statutory language passed by Congress is ambiguous.
View referenced article
Author(s)
Related Insights
January 6, 2026
Foley Viewpoints
Shifting Enforcement Priorities at the CFTC and the SEC
Under the new administration, priorities have shifted at the Commodity Futures Trading Commission and the Securities and Exchange Commission, particularly with the enforcement divisions at both agencies — which had faced widespread internal and external criticism. Both the CFTC and SEC are undergoing structural changes as a shift away from regulation through enforcement. This article discusses these developments in detail.
January 5, 2026
Foley Viewpoints
Fred Ridley showcased in Sports Business Journal’s “The 125 Most Influential in Sports Business of the Past 25 Years
Fred Ridley took over as chairman of Augusta National Golf Club in the fall of 2017, and in those short eight years, he has enacted…
December 24, 2025
Tariff & International Trade Resource
What Every Multinational Should Know About … Preserving the Right to IEEPA Tariff Refunds (Updated with FAQs)
Any company that has imported goods subject to the Trump administration’s fentanyl-based tariffs or reciprocal tariffs — i.e., the tariffs levied pursuant to the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (the IEEPA tariffs) — needs to consider filing an action in the U.S. Court of International Trade (CIT) to preserve the possibility of recovering refunds of these tariffs.