Charles (Charlie) Niemann is a member of the firm’s Commercial Litigation Practice and the Consumer Law, Finance & Class Action Group. Charlie has broad experience litigating complex commercial and class action disputes in state and federal court, in addition to arbitral forums. He has defended clients against claims brought under various consumer protection statutes and in the area of antitrust.
프레젠테이션 및 출판물
- Co-author, “Resolving Business Disputes: U.S. Discovery in Aid of International Private Commercial Arbitration,” Wisconsin Lawyer (November 10, 2020)
- Co-author, “U.S. Discovery in Aid of International Private Commercial Arbitration,” ARIAS•U.S. Quarterly (September 2020)
- Co-author, “Supreme Court to Decide Whether Reference to Injunctive Relief in Arbitration Clause Gives Court Power to Rule on Arbitrability of Dispute,” Legal News: Insurance & Reinsurance (July 17, 2020)
CFPB, FCRA 선취의 범위를 명확히 하는 새로운 해석 규칙 발표
트위터에 공유
이메일로 공유
공유
맨 위로 돌아가기
소비자금융보호국(CFPB)은 어제 신용 보고 영역과 관련된 주법에 대한 공정신용보고법(FCRA)의 선결권 범위를 명확히 하는 해석 규칙을 발표했습니다. 이 규칙을 시행하면서 CFPB는 FCRA에 따른 연방의 선점 범위를 제한하고자 했던 2022년 7월 해석 규칙의 2025년 5월 철회를 확인했습니다.
Fourth Circuit Holds No Article III Standing Where No Third-Party Viewed Inaccurate Information
On September 11, 2024, the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals held that there is no publication to a third party — and therefore no Article III standing under the Fair Credit Reporting Act — where the recipient of a consumer report did not read, understand, or otherwise consider allegedly inaccurate information appearing in the report.
일부 판사들은 '천연' 라벨에 도전하는 허위 광고 집단 소송에 대해 회의적인 시각을 갖게 되었습니다.
최근 소비자 제품 허위 광고 집단 소송의 트렌드 중 하나는 "모든 천연" 또는 "100% 천연"이라고 성분을 선전하는 제품에 대한 허위 광고를 주장하는 소송이 증가하고 있다는 점입니다.
S.D.N.Y. Finds Arbitration Clause in Insurance Contract Unenforceable, Following Second Circuit Precedent that the McCarran-Ferguson Act Preempts the New York Convention
Two recent decisions from the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York highlight the split among circuits on whether state insurance laws that prohibit arbitration of insurance and reinsurance disputes are preempted by the New York Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards.
Eleventh Circuit Joins Its Sister Circuits in Holding that the FAA’s Grounds for Vacating Domestic Awards Are Available to Challenge International Arbitration Awards Rendered in the United States or Decided under U.S. Law
The Eleventh Circuit held last week that in primary jurisdiction cases, “Chapter 1 of the FAA provides the grounds for vacatur of an arbitral award.”
Can a Federal Court Refuse Recognition of a Nondomestic Arbitral Award Issued in the United States on the “Exceeding Powers” Ground?
On February 14, the en banc Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals will hear oral argument in Corporacion AIC, S.A. v. Hidroelectrica Santa Rita S.A. (AICSA v. HSR), a case with significant importance for the enforceability in the United States of nondomestic arbitration awards that are rendered in such busy arbitral seats as Miami and Atlanta.