Partner Scott Seabolt was quoted in an Inside Counsel article, “Spoliation Sanctions Shift,” which appeared in the November 2014 issue. The article discussed e-discovery spoliation sanctions, high discovery costs and the U.S. Judicial Conference Committee’s recently approved changes to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure rule 37(e). Seabolt was quoted saying, “What’s interesting about the new rules is that they’re much more substantive than what you’ve seen in the past, in terms of how they deal with spoliation and articulating the factors that ought to be considered in deciding whether there’s been prejudice or not. It’s one of those rare circumstances where I’ve seen the Rules go a little bit further into the weeds rather than leaving it to the judges to figure it out through the development of case law.”
Related News
12 September 2024
In the News
Jeffrey Kopp on Workplace Discrimination Claims – 'Promptly investigate and take remedial action'
11 September 2024
In the News
Christopher Cain on Tech M&A Activity – 'VC firms need to have that release valve'
Foley & Lardner LLP partner Christopher Cain assessed M&A activity in the technology sector in the Mergers & Acquisitions article, "Tech M&A’s Uneven Comeback: Winners and Losers are Segment-Specific."
06 September 2024
In the News
Natasha Allen on California AI Legislation – 'California definitely wants to be on the forefront'
Foley & Lardner LLP partner Natasha Allen commented on recent California legislative action designed to regulate the development and deployment of artificial intelligence in the Law360 article, "Calif. Takes AI Reins With Looming Safety, Transparency Laws."