Berg Quoted on Legal Issues Surrounding Cellphone Decryption
29 February 2016
New York Times
Special Counsel Eric Berg was quoted in a New York Times article, “Apple Wins Ruling in New York iPhone Hacking Order,” on February 29, 2016. The article discussed the complex legal issues surrounding the government requests to unlock personal phones tied to various crimes and corruption. Most recently, a federal magistrate judge denied a government request for Apple to extract data from an iPhone related to a drug case, giving pro-privacy cases a leg up. Berg said the decision is not binding for the San Bernardino case and he was quoted saying, “From a technical, legal standpoint, it doesn’t really have much of an effect in the California districts. [But] if you start with public opinion, this is going to be viewed as a victory for the privacy lobby and a defeat for the government in that battle over privacy.”
Related News
18 April 2025
In the News
Kyle Hayes Joined NPM Interconnections Podcast to Discuss Green Hydrogen Industry
Foley & Lardner LLP partner Kyle Hayes joined the New Project Media Interconnections podcast to share insights on the state of the green hydrogen industry in the United States.
17 April 2025
In the News
Donald Schroeder Shares Insight on Legislative Push for Gig Driver Unionization
Foley & Lardner LLP partner Donald Schroeder commented on the legislative push for gig driver unionization in the Law360 article, "Minn. Gig Driver Union Bills Raise Employee Status Concerns."
17 April 2025
In the News
Foley Attorneys Publish on International Arbitration's Role in Tariff Dispute Resolution
With the Trump administration's emphasis on tariffs, including introducing tariffs against the U.S.' three biggest trading partners and advocating for an External Revenue Service to collect tariffs and other foreign revenue, members of the business world face increasing uncertainties as they assess and renegotiate the cost of doing business and obligations under a changed economic and political landscape, increasing the likelihood of contract disputes.