Is the DEA Poised to Regulate Telepharmacy?

On November 16, 2021, the Drug Enforcement Agency (DEA) issued an advance notice of proposed rulemaking, exploring whether or not to create new federal regulations governing the practice of telepharmacy. These regulations would govern the receipt of prescriptions and dispensing of controlled substances by pharmacists practicing across multiple states. The DEA hopes such regulations will impose uniformity and standardization to a healthcare industry that increasingly draws on technology and multistate geographic footprints to reduce costs, increase patient access, and drive convenient delivery of medications to consumers. The DEA’s notice provides the industry with an opportunity to provide insight and feedback that may help shape the new regulations.

What is Telepharmacy?

The term telepharmacy is not defined under Federal law, but typically involves a remote pharmacist delivering pharmacist care via telecommunication technologies to a patient located at a dispensing site. Such pharmacist care may include, but is not limited to: the dispensing and distribution of prescription drugs, drug use review, patient counseling services, and drug therapy monitoring. Depending on the relevant state authority and regulations, telepharmacies may fill paper prescriptions or electronic prescriptions.

The practice of telepharmacy varies from state to state, but current models generally fall within one of two categories:

Brick and mortar remote sites are traditional, storefront businesses, physically staffed by non-pharmacist employees, e.g., pharmacy technicians, who are remotely supervised by a pharmacist located in a separate ‘‘parent’’ or ‘‘hub’’ pharmacy, via continuous and real-time computer, video, and audio links (i.e., telecommunication connection). Depending on the state, a pharmacy technician may assist the remote pharmacist by receiving and inputting prescriptions into the pharmacy’s information management system and preparing prescriptions for dispensing.
Self-service, automated machines are kiosks (think vending machine but for prescription drugs) which contain pharmacy prescription medication/inventory, labeling equipment, and the telecommunication technology that connects the patient-user to the remote pharmacist via real-time video and audio links. Such automated machines may accept prescriptions or refill orders, store prepackaged or repackaged medications, label and dispense patient-specific prescriptions, and ultimately dispense the prescription to the patient-user.

What Does This Mean for Online or Mail Order Pharmacies?

Perhaps not much. The practice of telepharmacy differs from online pharmacies or mail order pharmacies, which often contract with telemedicine companies to serve as a fulfillment option for patients. Online pharmacies are regulated at the federal level under the Ryan Haight Online Pharmacy Consumer Protection Act of 2008, which requires these pharmacies register with the DEA. But most online pharmacies are exempt from this registration if they dispense only electronically-prescribed controlled substances. Indeed, there are no online pharmacies registered with the DEA. Many states have also implemented laws and regulations governing telepharmacy practices, but variations and inconsistencies among these laws create hurdles for telepharmacy businesses that seek to operate across state lines.

Despite the specter of increased regulation and its potential to stifle innovation, the DEA has asked stakeholders to share ideas, recommendations, and insight on current pharmacy practices, which will be used to help shape future regulations. The notice sets forth 39 specific questions the DEA would like to hear comments on, such as the adequacy of remote pharmacist supervision, common ownership of hub pharmacies and remote kiosks, security standards, drug diversion and pedigree, accessibility and safety requirements, and the manner in which the telepharmacist verifies prescriptions filled remotely. Read the complete list of 39 questions here.

How to Submit Comments to the DEA

Pharmacies, technology companies, and virtual care entrepreneurs interested in telepharmacy should consider providing comments. DEA is soliciting comments until 11:59 p.m. on January 18, 2022. Anyone may submit comments – anonymously or otherwise – via electronic submission at this link. When commenting, refer to file code RIN 1117–AB74/Docket No. DEA–759 in your submission. Alternatively, commenters may submit comments by mail to:

Drug Enforcement Administration, Attn: DEA Federal Register Representative/DPW, 8701 Morrissette Drive, Springfield, VA 22152–2639.

Telepharmacy can offer a meaningful shift in the scope and processes of pharmacy practice. The regulators often are slow to adopt different and often more efficient ways to deliver telehealth care services. The prescribing and dispensing of controlled substances is a particularly sensitive area given the abuse of opioids and other controlled substances. The DEA notice indicates that there is a recognition and opportunity to help shape this change in telepharmacy. Now is the time to make your voice heard.

Want to Learn More?

For more information on telemedicine, telehealth, virtual care, remote patient monitoring, digital health, and other health innovations, including the team, publications, and representative experience, visit Foley’s Telemedicine & Digital Health Industry Team.

This blog is made available by Foley & Lardner LLP (“Foley” or “the Firm”) for informational purposes only. It is not meant to convey the Firm’s legal position on behalf of any client, nor is it intended to convey specific legal advice. Any opinions expressed in this article do not necessarily reflect the views of Foley & Lardner LLP, its partners, or its clients. Accordingly, do not act upon this information without seeking counsel from a licensed attorney. This blog is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship. Communicating with Foley through this website by email, blog post, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship for any legal matter. Therefore, any communication or material you transmit to Foley through this blog, whether by email, blog post or any other manner, will not be treated as confidential or proprietary. The information on this blog is published “AS IS” and is not guaranteed to be complete, accurate, and or up-to-date. Foley makes no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, as to the operation or content of the site. Foley expressly disclaims all other guarantees, warranties, conditions and representations of any kind, either express or implied, whether arising under any statute, law, commercial use or otherwise, including implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Foley or any of its partners, officers, employees, agents or affiliates be liable, directly or indirectly, under any theory of law (contract, tort, negligence or otherwise), to you or anyone else, for any claims, losses or damages, direct, indirect special, incidental, punitive or consequential, resulting from or occasioned by the creation, use of or reliance on this site (including information and other content) or any third party websites or the information, resources or material accessed through any such websites. In some jurisdictions, the contents of this blog may be considered Attorney Advertising. If applicable, please note that prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Photographs are for dramatization purposes only and may include models. Likenesses do not necessarily imply current client, partnership or employee status.