The game is in the name of the game−and the name of the game is ESG: SEC proposes new Fund rules to further combat “Greenwashing”

Continuing its focus on ESG practices within the fund industry, the Securities and Exchange Commission released proposed rules on May 25, 2022, that are intended to allow investors to readily discern whether a fund is focused on an ESG strategy and, if so focused, what the fund’s goals are and how it is progressing toward such goals.

The Proposed Naming Rules

Under the current naming rule, Rule 35d-1, if a registered investment company’s name suggests it has a focus on particular investment types, industries, or geographies, or that it has tax-exempt status, then such a fund must adopt a policy to invest at least 80% of the value of its assets consistent with its name. The naming rule, proposed to apply to business development companies as well as registered investment companies, recognizes that while investors should review a fund’s disclosures, a fund’s name can be a significant factor in an investor’s investment decision.

The SEC’s proposal will expand the naming rule to do four things:

Expand the 80% requirement to apply to funds whose names suggest they invest in issuers or investments with particular characteristics such as ESG themes.
The proposal will require funds whose assets fall below the 80% requirement to come back into compliance within 30 days.
The proposal will require a fund to disclose how it defines the terms in its name and selects investments reflective of its name. Funds will have to report on Form N-PORT that their investments fulfill the 80% requirement.
Funds investing in derivatives will be required to use the notional amount of the derivatives and not the market value of the derivatives in determining compliance with the 80% requirement.

The proposal notes that funds that consider ESG factors along with other factors without giving greater significance to the ESG factors will not be able to use ESG terms in their fund names.

The Proposed ESG Disclosure Rules

In a separate release, the SEC is also proposing new rules regarding the disclosure of ESG information for registered investment companies, business development companies, registered investment advisers, and certain unregistered advisers in order to promote both comparability and reliability of ESG information.

Funds that consider ESG factors in making investment decisions will be required to disclose additional information. The level of such additional information will depend upon the type of fund. The proposed rule identifies three types of funds:

Integration Funds – These are funds that integrate ESG factors alongside non-ESG factors in investment decisions. Integration funds will be required to describe how ESG factors are incorporated into their investment process.

ESG-Focused Funds – These are funds that give significant consideration to ESG factors. ESG-focused funds will be required to provide detailed disclosures, including a strategy overview table.

Impact Funds – These are funds that are ESG-Focused funds that seek to achieve a particular ESG impact. Impact funds will be required to disclose how they measure progress toward their objective.

Advisers who consider ESG factors will be required to make disclosures in their brochures regarding their consideration of ESG factors in their investment strategies and report certain ESG information in their annual filings with the SEC.

ESG-Focused funds that use proxy voting or engagement with issuers as a means of implementing their ESG strategy will be required to disclose their proxy voting and issuer engagement.

ESG-Focused funds that consider environmental factors will be required to disclose their carbon footprint and the carbon intensity of their investment portfolio. The SEC stated that these disclosures are intended to allow investors to compare greenhouse gas emissions between funds or other investments. Funds that do not consider greenhouse gas emissions will not be required to provide such disclosures.

If an Integration fund considers greenhouse gas emissions, then the Integration fund would be required to disclose how the fund considers such emissions and the methodology and data sources considered by the fund.

Volgende stappen

Both rules are now set to go through the required public notice and comment process before being enacted. The comment period for each proposed rule will end 60 days after the proposed rule is published in the Federal Register.

Disclaimer

Deze blog wordt ter beschikking gesteld door Foley & Lardner LLP ("Foley" of "het kantoor") voor informatieve doeleinden. Het is niet bedoeld om het juridische standpunt van het kantoor namens een cliënt over te brengen, noch is het bedoeld om specifiek juridisch advies te geven. Eventuele meningen in dit artikel weerspiegelen niet noodzakelijkerwijs de standpunten van Foley & Lardner LLP, haar partners of haar cliënten. Handel daarom niet op basis van deze informatie zonder advies te vragen aan een bevoegde advocaat. Deze blog is niet bedoeld om een advocaat-cliënt relatie te creëren en de ontvangst ervan vormt geen advocaat-cliënt relatie. Communicatie met Foley via deze website per e-mail, blogbericht of anderszins creëert geen advocaat-cliënt relatie voor welke juridische kwestie dan ook. Daarom wordt communicatie of materiaal dat u via deze blog naar Foley verzendt, hetzij via e-mail, blogpost of op een andere manier, niet behandeld als vertrouwelijk of als eigendom. De informatie op deze blog wordt gepubliceerd "AS IS" en is niet gegarandeerd volledig, nauwkeurig en/of up-to-date. Foley geeft geen verklaringen of garanties van welke aard dan ook, expliciet of impliciet, met betrekking tot de werking of inhoud van de site. Foley wijst uitdrukkelijk alle andere garanties, waarborgen, voorwaarden en verklaringen van welke aard dan ook af, hetzij uitdrukkelijk of impliciet, hetzij voortvloeiend uit een wet, wet, commercieel gebruik of anderszins, met inbegrip van impliciete garanties van verkoopbaarheid, geschiktheid voor een bepaald doel, titel en niet-inbreuk. In geen geval zal Foley of een van haar partners, functionarissen, werknemers, agenten of filialen aansprakelijk zijn, direct of indirect, onder welke rechtsleer dan ook (contract, onrechtmatige daad, nalatigheid of anderszins), jegens u of iemand anders, voor claims, verliezen of schade, direct, indirect speciaal, incidenteel, bestraffend of gevolgschade, voortvloeiend uit of veroorzaakt door de creatie, het gebruik van of het vertrouwen op deze site (inclusief informatie en andere inhoud) of websites van derden of de informatie, middelen of het materiaal waartoe toegang wordt verkregen via dergelijke websites. In sommige rechtsgebieden kan de inhoud van deze blog worden beschouwd als advocaatreclame. Houd er, indien van toepassing, rekening mee dat eerdere resultaten geen garantie bieden voor een vergelijkbaar resultaat. Foto's zijn alleen voor dramaturgische doeleinden en kunnen modellen bevatten. Afbeeldingen impliceren niet noodzakelijkerwijs een huidige status als cliënt, partner of werknemer.