Foley verwerpt certiorari-verzoek voor LSQ-financieringsgroep in ontwijkingsactie

Na jaren van rechtszaken heeft Foley & Lardner LLP LSQ Funding Group met succes vertegenwoordigd in het verzet tegen het verzoek van Douglas Mann, een curator in het kader van Chapter 7, aan het Amerikaanse Hooggerechtshof om een certiorari-dagvaarding, waarmee definitief een einde kwam aan de vorderingen van Mann tegen LSQ wegens preferentiële behandeling en frauduleuze overdracht. Het Hooggerechtshof heeft het verzoek van Mann op 8 januari 2024 afgewezen.

In the underlying litigation, Mann asserted preference and fraudulent transfer claims against LSQ in the bankruptcy case of Engstrom Inc. Mann alleged that Engstrom was engaged in a Ponzi-like scheme of factoring worthless invoices with LSQ. When another financier stepped into the relationship, LSQ received a $10.3 million payoff directly from that third party. Engstrom never received or had any control over those funds. Shortly thereafter, Engstrom filed for bankruptcy.

Foley initially prevailed on summary judgment before the U.S. Bankruptcy Court, which held that, under the “earmarking doctrine,” the funds that LSQ received did not constitute an “interest of the debtor in property” under Sections 544, 547, and 548 of the Bankruptcy Code and, therefore, could not be the subject of preference or fraudulent transfer claims. The U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit subsequently affirmed that decision.

In the petition, Mann argued that the earmarking doctrine does not apply to fraudulent transfer claims, suggesting that the appellate courts are divided on the issue. LSQ responded that no circuit split exists on that issue and that an “interest of the debtor in property” for all avoidance actions must be defined as “property that would have been part of the estate had it not been transferred” before the bankruptcy. Under this appropriate standard, the funds LSQ received were never part of Engstrom’s estate because LSQ was paid directly from the third-party financier and, therefore, the transfer “did not satisfy this common statutory prerequisite for avoidance actions.”

The Foley team representing LSQ was led by partners Thomas Shriner and Andrew Wronski and included senior counsel Anne-Louise Mittal and Max Meckstroth.