Savannah L. Levin
Geassocieerd
Savannah Levin is a Commercial Litigation associate in the firm’s Los Angeles office.
Prior to joining Foley, Savannah worked as a law clerk for two other law firms. There, she was responsible for conducting research and writing memoranda regarding client conflicts and negligent supervision. Additionally, Savannah externed for Superior Court of Orange County Judge Deborah C. Servino where she prepared weekly memoranda in anticipation of the week’s Law and Motion calendar.
Savannah began her career with Foley as a summer associate.
Accolades and Recognition
- Law.com, finalist for Most Prominent Newcomer (2025)
Savannah Levin Highlighted for Most Promising Newcomer Recognition
Foley & Lardner LLP associate Savannah Levin is featured in a Q&A with The Recorder for her recognition as a finalist in the Most Promising Newcomer category at the Law.com California Legal Awards.
James McFall en Savannah Levin finalisten bij Law.com's California Legal Awards
Foley & Lardner LLP partner James McFall en partner Savannah Levin zijn finalisten voor Law.com's 2025 California Legal Awards.
Trump Administration’s Executive Orders Attempt To Reset Sex & Gender Identity Issues in Women’s Sports
In January 2025, the Republican Party took control of both houses of Congress and the White House, portending seismic policy shifts around women’s and college sports.
Geen schade, geen overtreding: Rechtszaak over groenwassen afgewezen wegens gebrek aan artikel III-bevoegdheid
Volgens artikel III van de Grondwet zijn federale rechtbanken van de Verenigde Staten beperkt tot het berechten van "zaken en geschillen".
Foley LA bereidt Boys & Girls Clubs-studenten voor op Jeugd van het Jaar-competitie
Nicholas Gross, partner bij Foley & Lardner LLP, en Trevor Mullin, Kathryn Petrosky, Jordan Smiley, Savannah Levin, Troy Tessem en Tam Wheat hielpen studenten van de Boys & Girls Clubs of Metro Los Angeles zich voor te bereiden op de jaarlijkse wedstrijd Jeugd van het Jaar.
Should I Stay or Should I Go: Supreme Court to Consider Whether Federal Courts Can Dismiss or Must Stay Cases Pending Arbitration
On January 12, 2024, the U.S. Supreme Court granted certiorari in Smith, et al. v. Spizzirri, et al., No. 22-1218 to consider whether a district court must stay a case — rather than dismiss it — when presented with an enforceable arbitration agreement.