CFPB Extends TRID Effective Date to October 1
18 de junho de 2015
The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (“CFPB”) announced that it would provide mortgage lenders with additional time to prepare for the highly anticipated TILA-RESPA Integrated Disclosures (“TRID”). Since the issuance of TRID’s final regulations in November 2013, mortgage lenders have been frantically preparing for its effective date of August 1, 2015. Generally speaking, TRID will consolidate mortgage disclosures forms currently required by Truth-in-Lending Act (“TILA”) and the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act (“RESPA”) into only two forms—the Loan Estimate and the Closing Disclosure—purportedly to assist buyers in understanding the home buying process. According to the CFPB’s Director Richard Corday, the agency now intends to push back the TRID’s effective date to October 1, 2015 due to an unexplained “administrative error.” This announcement comes shortly after the agency declared that for a short period after the TRID’s effective date it would consider a lender’s efforts to comply with new disclosures when enforcing TRID.
Informações relacionadas
February 25, 2025
Consumer Class Defense Counsel
CFPB, FDIC, and OCC Updates: Firings, Appointments, and Potential Consolidation
We previously reported on changes to leadership at the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB), the halt of all activities at the CFPB, and the impacts to the financial services industry.
December 4, 2024
Blogs
Consumer Financial Protection Bureau Proposes Rule to Regulate Data Brokers Under Fair Credit Reporting Act
The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau announced a proposed new rule that all data brokers be regulated under the 1970 Fair Credit Reporting Act, a federal law that protects the use and privacy of credit data and requires information in consumer reports (informally known as credit reports) to be accurate.
May 17, 2024
Consumer Class Defense Counsel
Supreme Court Rules That the CFPB Is Constitutionally Funded
On May 16, 2024, the Supreme Court reversed a Fifth Circuit decision which held that the funding for the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau violated the Appropriations Clause.