Manual de marcas registadas: estratégias proactivas para evitar litígios e a confusão dos consumidores

This article was republished in Westlaw Today on April 23, 2024.

Trademark disputes can be time-consuming and costly. By proactively assessing risks and taking steps to avoid infringement, emerging companies save time and money. At the crux of most trademark disputes is the claim that consumers are likely to be confused by the simultaneous use of brand-identifiers by unrelated parties. A “brand-identifier” is anything that a consumer associates with a company such as its brand name, logo, tagline, or the look or shape of its packaging.

Preventing Customer Confusion Prior to Adoption of a New Mark

Trademark conflicts arise when a company uses a brand name without first conducting a trademark clearance search. In a trademark clearance search, an experienced attorney reviews the landscape of existing trademarks to assess the risk that the company’s proposed trademark will infringe an existing trademark. A clearance search evaluates existing trademark registrations and information about unregistered use.

Consider Company A, an emerging food and beverage company that developed a delicious new energy bar. Company A is still in its growth phase and resources are tight; it foregoes a trademark clearance search before launching its product. Company A releases its new ZEST brand energy bar, and it immediately gets traction. Consumers love it and retailers contact Company A to discuss distribution deals. The market buzz gets the attention of Company B.

Company B sold energy drinks under the brand ZESTY for several years. Company B sends a trademark cease and desist letter to Company A asserting that its use of ZEST infringes Company B’s trademark rights in ZESTY. At the heart of Company B’s letter is the claim that consumers will think that an energy bar called ZEST and energy drinks called ZESTY come from the same company or related companies.

Company A must now choose to either engage in a legal battle to keep calling its product ZEST, thus diverting its limited resources to legal fees, or rebranding to a new name, which could mean pulling products from shelves, designing new packaging, and losing the consumer goodwill it worked to acquire in ZEST.

Engaging an experienced trademark attorney to run a clearance search before market entry significantly reduces the risk that an emerging F&B company would face this business interruption.

Preventing Consumer Confusion Once in the Market

Once a brand is established, the brand owner must act when it uncovers potential infringement – like Company B did in the hypothetical discussed above. Consistent enforcement is essential to establishing and maintaining a strong brand.

Companies should monitor the marketplace, trade shows, and other industry channels for third parties using similar source-identifiers. A company may subscribe to a trademark watch service that alerts it when trademark applications featuring similar marks are filed.

When a company learns of a potentially infringing use or application, it should consult with a trademark attorney to discuss appropriate action. There are many ways for companies to enforce their rights. For example, companies can send cease and desist letters, oppose the registration of similar marks, and even negotiate contractual arrangements with other parties to avoid consumer confusion. Often, parties can resolve trademark disputes without going to court.

Risk Reduction Strategies

While it is impossible to eliminate all intellectual property risks, these steps help manage risks:

Conduct clearance searches: Before launching products with new names and designs, companies should engage trademark counsel to conduct clearance searches to identify potential conflicts and/or provide reassurance that a mark is available for use and registration. Clearance searches can help identify issues before significant resources are invested in promoting and using a trademark.
Register trademarks and use them: Companies should apply to register their marks at the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office and actively use their marks. Registration has multiple benefits. Registration provides notice to others of the registration owner’s and the resulting protections become assets of the company that may be sold, licensed, and enforced trademark rights. Note, a trademark owner must use its mark as registered to maintain its trademark rights. Thus, companies must continuously use their marks or risk losing their rights.
Trademark Monitoring – Companies should monitor the marketplace and the trademark office database for third parties encroaching on their brand. Sometimes trademark disputes are inevitable, especially if others are infringing your rights.

Companies that act early to develop intellectual property rights and prevent infringement save valuable time and resources. By prioritizing proactive trademark management practices, emerging companies can navigate the competitive landscape with confidence, safeguard their brand identity, and position themselves for long-term success in the marketplace. The importance of proactive trademark management cannot be overstated for emerging companies seeking to establish and maintain a strong brand presence. If you need assistance, please reach out to the authors or your Foley relationship partner with any questions.

Clique aqui para subscrever a série Foley's Healthy F&B e ler os outros artigos da nossa série.

Declaração de exoneração de responsabilidade

Este blogue é disponibilizado por Foley & Lardner LLP ("Foley" ou "a Firma") apenas para fins informativos. Não se destina a transmitir a posição jurídica da Sociedade em nome de qualquer cliente, nem a prestar aconselhamento jurídico específico. As opiniões expressas neste artigo não reflectem necessariamente a posição da Foley & Lardner LLP, dos seus sócios ou dos seus clientes. Por conseguinte, não actue de acordo com esta informação sem procurar aconselhamento junto de um advogado licenciado. Este blogue não se destina a criar, e a sua receção não constitui, uma relação advogado-cliente. A comunicação com a Foley através deste sítio Web, por correio eletrónico, publicação no blogue ou outro, não cria uma relação advogado-cliente para qualquer assunto jurídico. Por conseguinte, qualquer comunicação ou material que transmita a Foley através deste blogue, seja por correio eletrónico, publicação no blogue ou qualquer outra forma, não será tratado como confidencial ou proprietário. A informação neste blogue é publicada "COMO ESTÁ" e não se garante que seja completa, exacta ou actualizada. A Foley não faz representações ou garantias de qualquer tipo, expressas ou implícitas, quanto ao funcionamento ou conteúdo do sítio. A Foley renuncia expressamente a todas as outras garantias, garantias, condições e representações de qualquer tipo, expressas ou implícitas, quer surjam ao abrigo de qualquer estatuto, lei, utilização comercial ou de outra forma, incluindo garantias implícitas de comercialização, adequação a um determinado fim, título e não infração. Em nenhuma circunstância a Foley ou qualquer um dos seus parceiros, oficiais, funcionários, agentes ou afiliados serão responsáveis, direta ou indiretamente, sob qualquer teoria da lei (contrato, delito, negligência ou outra), perante si ou qualquer outra pessoa, por quaisquer reclamações, perdas ou danos, diretos, indirectos, especiais, incidentais, punitivos ou consequenciais, resultantes ou ocasionados pela criação, utilização ou confiança neste site (incluindo informações e outros conteúdos) ou quaisquer sites de terceiros ou as informações, recursos ou materiais acedidos através de tais sites. Em algumas jurisdições, o conteúdo deste blogue pode ser considerado publicidade de advogados. Se aplicável, tenha em atenção que resultados anteriores não garantem um resultado semelhante. As fotografias destinam-se apenas a fins de dramatização e podem incluir modelos. As imagens não implicam necessariamente o estatuto atual de cliente, parceiro ou empregado.