Customs Fraud Makes the Big Leagues: DOJ’s New White-Collar Priorities Confirm Heightened Risk

Last month, the Department of Justice put trade, customs, and tariff fraud squarely in the spotlight. This isn’t just another line item on the compliance checklist, it’s a loud-and-clear signal that import-related enforcement is no longer just an administrative concern. It’s now a front-and-center DOJ priority.

On May 12, DOJ Criminal Division Chief Matthew Galeotti announced 10 high-impact white-collar enforcement priorities. Sitting alongside health care fraud, corporate recidivism, and national-security-linked corruption was something you would not have seen from prior administrations: customs and trade fraud, including tariff evasion.

It’s not a surprising move — at least not to us. Back in March, our International Trade team at Foley predicted this turn in two separate publications:

We noted then that customs enforcement was moving out of the regulatory shadows and toward the aggressive tactics historically reserved for FCPA, health care, and financial crimes. With this new DOJ announcement, that evolution is now official policy.

What’s Driving the DOJ’s Shift?

This enforcement focus is no accident. It reflects the broader “America First” priorities of the Trump administration, a strategy aimed at reshaping global trade in favor of U.S. interests, as well as a means of collecting additional revenue. From sweeping tariffs to heightened scrutiny of Chinese imports, the administration is using every tool at its disposal — civil, criminal, and regulatory — to protect domestic industry, to close perceived trade loopholes, and to ensure collection of all tariffs. As Galeotti summarized the DOJ’s new approach, “[t]rade and customs fraudsters, including those who commit tariff evasion, seek to circumvent the rules and regulations that protect American consumers and undermine the Administration’s efforts to create jobs and increase investment in the United States. Prosecuting such frauds will ensure that American businesses are competing on a level playing field in global trade and commerce.” For companies that import goods, the message is clear: Compliance with trade laws is no longer just a regulatory obligation, it’s a frontline national priority.

What In-House Counsel Should Do Now: A Practical Framework

In response, manufacturers should elevate trade compliance to the same level of urgency as anti-corruption or sanctions compliance. Drawing from our comprehensive white paper, Managing Import and Tariff Risks During a Trade War, here’s a practical framework for GCs and compliance officers:

Identify Your Risks

Retrieve and analyze your company’s ACE (Automated Commercial Environment) import data.
Conduct a customs risk audit, focusing particularly on ensuring that HTS classifications and countries of origin are accurately (and consistently) reported to Customs for all imports.
Map supply chain and broker relationships.

Plan for Disruption

Diversify sourcing and build supply chain flexibility.
Collaborate with finance to model tariff impact scenarios.
Establish rapid-response strategies for emerging duties or bans.

Manage Contractual Exposure

Build tariff pass-through mechanisms into commercial agreements.
Include change-in-law clauses that allow flexibility in sourcing.
Clearly define responsibility for customs classifications and compliance.

Minimize Legal Exposure

Review and correct import declarations regularly.
Confirm compliance with UFLPA and other partner agency rules.
Implement internal controls around broker instructions and tariff engineering.

Identify Cost-Saving Opportunities

Explore bonded warehouses, FTZs, and drawback programs.
Assess opportunities for tariff engineering and preferential treatment under trade agreements like USMCA.
Consider use of temporary importation bonds (TIBs) where appropriate.

Strengthen Supply Chain Integrity

Perform due diligence on upstream suppliers.
Map materials and origin to avoid forced labor violations.
Implement traceability protocols and audit programs.

This isn’t just a customs compliance issue anymore, it’s a corporate integrity and reputational risk issue. The whistleblower incentives are real, especially under the False Claims Act. The penalties are large. And the prosecutorial appetite is growing.

O que levar

We’ve said it before, and we’ll say it again: Customs fraud has moved from the margins to the mainstream of DOJ enforcement.

If your company imports goods, trade compliance should be a priority. DOJ is not waiting for egregious cases; it is actively looking for systemic vulnerabilities, misclassifications, and tariff evasion strategies dressed up as “logistical creativity.”

The time for general counsel to engage is now. Audit. Adjust. Contract. Train. Fix. Because enhanced enforcement is not coming someday — it’s already here.

Additional content on all things Customs and international trade is found on our Tariff & International Trade Resources page. For more insights or a tailored compliance review, reach out to the author or International Trade or International Investigations teams at Foley & Lardner LLP. We’ve been tracking this shift since before it was fashionable.

Declaração de exoneração de responsabilidade

Este blogue é disponibilizado por Foley & Lardner LLP ("Foley" ou "a Firma") apenas para fins informativos. Não se destina a transmitir a posição jurídica da Sociedade em nome de qualquer cliente, nem a prestar aconselhamento jurídico específico. As opiniões expressas neste artigo não reflectem necessariamente a posição da Foley & Lardner LLP, dos seus sócios ou dos seus clientes. Por conseguinte, não actue de acordo com esta informação sem procurar aconselhamento junto de um advogado licenciado. Este blogue não se destina a criar, e a sua receção não constitui, uma relação advogado-cliente. A comunicação com a Foley através deste sítio Web, por correio eletrónico, publicação no blogue ou outro, não cria uma relação advogado-cliente para qualquer assunto jurídico. Por conseguinte, qualquer comunicação ou material que transmita a Foley através deste blogue, seja por correio eletrónico, publicação no blogue ou qualquer outra forma, não será tratado como confidencial ou proprietário. A informação neste blogue é publicada "COMO ESTÁ" e não se garante que seja completa, exacta ou actualizada. A Foley não faz representações ou garantias de qualquer tipo, expressas ou implícitas, quanto ao funcionamento ou conteúdo do sítio. A Foley renuncia expressamente a todas as outras garantias, garantias, condições e representações de qualquer tipo, expressas ou implícitas, quer surjam ao abrigo de qualquer estatuto, lei, utilização comercial ou de outra forma, incluindo garantias implícitas de comercialização, adequação a um determinado fim, título e não infração. Em nenhuma circunstância a Foley ou qualquer um dos seus parceiros, oficiais, funcionários, agentes ou afiliados serão responsáveis, direta ou indiretamente, sob qualquer teoria da lei (contrato, delito, negligência ou outra), perante si ou qualquer outra pessoa, por quaisquer reclamações, perdas ou danos, diretos, indirectos, especiais, incidentais, punitivos ou consequenciais, resultantes ou ocasionados pela criação, utilização ou confiança neste site (incluindo informações e outros conteúdos) ou quaisquer sites de terceiros ou as informações, recursos ou materiais acedidos através de tais sites. Em algumas jurisdições, o conteúdo deste blogue pode ser considerado publicidade de advogados. Se aplicável, tenha em atenção que resultados anteriores não garantem um resultado semelhante. As fotografias destinam-se apenas a fins de dramatização e podem incluir modelos. As imagens não implicam necessariamente o estatuto atual de cliente, parceiro ou empregado.