Telehealth is Here to Stay: New 50 State Survey of Commercial Insurance Laws Reveals Progress
02 December 2019
Two years after Foley’s 2017 Telemedicine and Digital Health Survey uncovered a demand for telemedicine and digital health services, as well as coverage and reimbursement to match the growing demand, Foley explores how each state has responded in its 2019 50-State Telehealth Survey plus District of Columbia (DC) of Commercial Payer Statutes.
The survey found that as of October 2019, 42 states maintain some sort of telehealth commercial payer law, however several of these state laws do not actually require coverage or payment parity.
Foley’s report breaks down variances in telehealth commercial statues state-by-state, including:
- States that have commercial payer statutes in place
- States that have coverage parity or limitations
- States that have payment parity
- States that impose originating site limits
- States that have patient cost shifting protection
- State laws that address telehealth narrow or exclusive networking
- States that require coverage of reimbursement of remote patient monitoring
- States that require coverage of store & forward/asynchronous telemedicine
To read the full survey, download the 2019 report.
Author(s)
Related Insights
16 May 2024
Events
You Be the Judge: Top Staffing Cases of 2023
Back by popular demand—combining value with a bit of levity: This interactive session features leading legal experts in staffing who will argue their cases before you, the jury, and let you decide the verdict.
27 March 2024
PharmaPatents
Federal Circuit Applies Safe Harbor to Imported Medical Device Samples
In a recent decision, a majority panel of the Federal Circuit held that the importation of medical devices to support efforts to recruit investigators for a clinical trial was shielded by the safe harbor.
27 March 2024
Legal News: Distribution & Franchise
Federal Court Analyzes Venue Statutes and Orders Transfer of Suit Against Franchisee
In Honest Abe Roofing Franchise, Inc. v. Lesjon Holdings, LLC, the District Court for the Southern District of Indiana ruled on a motion to dismiss for improper venue under Federal Rule 12(b)(3).