California OEHHA Proposes New Safe Harbor Warnings for Acrylamide in Foods

29 September 2021 Manufacturing Industry Advisor Blog
Authors: Nathan A. Beaver Sarah A. Slack Erik K. Swanholt Nicholas R. Johnson

On September 17, 2021, the California Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (“OEHHA”) proposed new, alternative safe harbor warnings for acrylamide exposures in food.  OEHHA’s stated goal is to reduce the potential for litigation concerning the sufficiency of warnings, because the new, optional safe harbor warnings are deemed “clear and reasonable” by the lead agency for purposes of Proposition 65. 

Proposition 65, California Health and Safety Code § 25249.5 et seq. (“Proposition 65”), requires companies to provide “clear and reasonable” warnings before “knowingly and intentionally” exposing California consumers to any chemicals listed as known to the State of California to cause cancer or reproductive toxicity.  There are limited exceptions to the warning requirement, including where it can be shown that exposure levels are below certain “safe harbor” threshold levels determined by the state.  Proposition 65 already provides generally-worded food exposure warning safe harbor language that is deemed to be “clear and reasonable” at Sec. 25607.2. 

OEHHA’s actions come partially in response to concerns raised by the parties in Cal. Chamber of Commerce v. Bonta, No. 2:19-cv-02019-KJM-JDP (E.D. Cal. Mar. 30, 2021) (“CalChamber”).  In the CalChamber case, the plaintiffs argue that the existing safe harbor warnings for exposure to acrylamide in foods – which state that acrylamide is “known” by the state to cause cancer – are overbroad, are false and misleading, and constitute a violation of First Amendment rights.

While the CalChamber case makes its way through the courts, and while OEHHA is still in the process of determining safe harbor levels for acrylamide in certain foods, OEHHA has proposed alternative safe harbor language that it intends to implement later this year, and which effectively softens the discussion of potential cancer risks.  If the proposed regulations are finalized without change, businesses can elect to use the safe harbor warning language for acrylamide exposure in food as follows:

"Consuming this product can expose you to acrylamide, a probable human carcinogen formed in some foods during cooking or processing at high temperatures.  Many factors affect your cancer risk, including the frequency and amount of the chemical consumed.  For more information including ways to reduce your exposure, see" 

We will continue to monitor developments in OEHHA’s proposed new acrylamide rulemaking.  In the meantime, as this issue unfolds, and based on their years of experience with Proposition 65, Foley attorneys are well-positioned to help food manufacturers, processors, and retailers craft tailored Proposition 65 warnings for acrylamide in food.

This blog is made available by Foley & Lardner LLP (“Foley” or “the Firm”) for informational purposes only. It is not meant to convey the Firm’s legal position on behalf of any client, nor is it intended to convey specific legal advice. Any opinions expressed in this article do not necessarily reflect the views of Foley & Lardner LLP, its partners, or its clients. Accordingly, do not act upon this information without seeking counsel from a licensed attorney. This blog is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship. Communicating with Foley through this website by email, blog post, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship for any legal matter. Therefore, any communication or material you transmit to Foley through this blog, whether by email, blog post or any other manner, will not be treated as confidential or proprietary. The information on this blog is published “AS IS” and is not guaranteed to be complete, accurate, and or up-to-date. Foley makes no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, as to the operation or content of the site. Foley expressly disclaims all other guarantees, warranties, conditions and representations of any kind, either express or implied, whether arising under any statute, law, commercial use or otherwise, including implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Foley or any of its partners, officers, employees, agents or affiliates be liable, directly or indirectly, under any theory of law (contract, tort, negligence or otherwise), to you or anyone else, for any claims, losses or damages, direct, indirect special, incidental, punitive or consequential, resulting from or occasioned by the creation, use of or reliance on this site (including information and other content) or any third party websites or the information, resources or material accessed through any such websites. In some jurisdictions, the contents of this blog may be considered Attorney Advertising. If applicable, please note that prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Photographs are for dramatization purposes only and may include models. Likenesses do not necessarily imply current client, partnership or employee status.

Related Services