Charles W. Niemann
Assoziiert
Charles (Charlie) Niemann is a member of Foley & Lardner’s Consumer Law, Finance & Class Action Group and its Commercial Litigation Practice where he focuses on defending companies in high-stakes litigation. He has extensive experience in complex commercial disputes and consumer class actions in state and federal courts across the county, in addition to arbitral forums. Charlie regularly defends companies against class action claims brought under various state consumer protection laws, including Unfair, Deceptive, or Abusive Acts or Practices (UDAAP) statutes, California’s Unfair Competition Law (UCL) and Consumer Legal Remedies Act (CLRA), the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA), the Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA), and the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA), among others.
Charlie has broad experience across industries, including manufacturing, consumer products, food and beverage, pharmaceuticals, consumer finance, and credit reporting. Charlie places an emphasis on developing creative and practical dispute resolution strategies tailored to the specific circumstances of Foley’s clients, with a focus on achieving cost‑effective resolutions of disputes whenever possible. Charlie also utilizes the scientific training he received as an undergraduate to support his clients’ defenses in false labeling and other litigation matters.
In addition to representing companies in high-stakes class actions, Charlie has significant experience guiding clients through government investigations and subpoenas, and managing enforcement inquiries to mitigate legal risk for clients.
Pro Bono
- Sojourner Family Peace Center: Domestic Abuse Injunction Petition Preparation with Volunteer Attorney Legal Team (VALT)
Präsentationen und Veröffentlichungen
- Co-author, “Fourth Circuit Holds No Article III Standing Where No Third-Party Viewed Inaccurate Information,” JD Supra (September 17, 2024)
- Co-author, “Some Judges Have — Naturally — Grown Skeptical of False Advertising Class Actions Challenging “Natural” Labels,” JD Supra (May 16, 2024)
- Co-author, “Resolving Business Disputes: U.S. Discovery in Aid of International Private Commercial Arbitration,” Wisconsin Lawyer (November 10, 2020)
CFPB kündigt neue Auslegungsregel an, die den Umfang des FCRA-Vorbehalts klarstellt
Der Vierte Gerichtsbezirk entscheidet, dass keine Klagebefugnis gemäß Artikel III besteht, wenn keine dritte Partei die unrichtigen Informationen gesehen hat.
Einige Richter sind – verständlicherweise – skeptisch gegenüber Sammelklagen wegen irreführender Werbung geworden, die „natürliche” Kennzeichnungen anfechten.
S.D.N.Y. befindet Schiedsklausel in Versicherungsvertrag für nicht durchsetzbar und folgt damit einem Präzedenzfall des Second Circuit, wonach der McCarran-Ferguson Act Vorrang vor der New Yorker Konvention hat.
Der Elfte Bundesberufungsgerichtshof schließt sich seinen Schwestergerichten an und entscheidet, dass die Gründe der FAA für die Aufhebung inländischer Schiedssprüche auch für die Anfechtung internationaler Schiedssprüche gelten, die in den Vereinigten Staaten ergangen sind oder nach US-Recht entschieden wurden.