Charles (Charlie) Niemann is a member of Foley & Lardner’s Consumer Law, Finance & Class Action Group and its Commercial Litigation Practice where he focuses on defending companies in high-stakes litigation. He has extensive experience in complex commercial disputes and consumer class actions in state and federal courts across the county, in addition to arbitral forums. Charlie regularly defends companies against class action claims brought under various state consumer protection laws, including Unfair, Deceptive, or Abusive Acts or Practices (UDAAP) statutes, California’s Unfair Competition Law (UCL) and Consumer Legal Remedies Act (CLRA), the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA), the Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA), and the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA), among others.
Charlie has broad experience across industries, including manufacturing, consumer products, food and beverage, pharmaceuticals, consumer finance, and credit reporting. Charlie places an emphasis on developing creative and practical dispute resolution strategies tailored to the specific circumstances of Foley’s clients, with a focus on achieving cost‑effective resolutions of disputes whenever possible. Charlie also utilizes the scientific training he received as an undergraduate to support his clients’ defenses in false labeling and other litigation matters.
In addition to representing companies in high-stakes class actions, Charlie has significant experience guiding clients through government investigations and subpoenas, and managing enforcement inquiries to mitigate legal risk for clients.
公益活动
- Sojourner Family Peace Center: Domestic Abuse Injunction Petition Preparation with Volunteer Attorney Legal Team (VALT)
演讲和出版物
- Co-author, “Fourth Circuit Holds No Article III Standing Where No Third-Party Viewed Inaccurate Information,” JD Supra (September 17, 2024)
- Co-author, “Some Judges Have — Naturally — Grown Skeptical of False Advertising Class Actions Challenging “Natural” Labels,” JD Supra (May 16, 2024)
- Co-author, “Resolving Business Disputes: U.S. Discovery in Aid of International Private Commercial Arbitration,” Wisconsin Lawyer (November 10, 2020)
CFPB 宣布新的解释性规则,澄清 FCRA 优先权的范围
Fourth Circuit Holds No Article III Standing Where No Third-Party Viewed Inaccurate Information
部分法官——自然地——对质疑"天然"标签的虚假广告集体诉讼产生了怀疑
纽约南区联邦地区法院依据第二巡回法院判例,认定保险合同中的仲裁条款不可强制执行,该判例依据《麦卡伦-弗格森法案》优先于《纽约公约》的原则作出。
第十一巡回上诉法院与其他巡回法院一致认定,联邦仲裁法(FAA)中撤销国内仲裁裁决的理由同样适用于挑战在美国境内作出或依据美国法律裁决的国际仲裁裁决。