ダークスーツに赤い柄のネクタイを締めた白髪の年配の男性が、シカゴを代表する弁護士のプロフェッショナリズムが反映された近代的な企業法律事務所に微笑みながら立っている。

クレイグ・フローレンス

パートナー

クレイグ・フローレンス

パートナー

Craig Florence is a senior trial and corporate litigation lawyer representing private and public companies in contentious business divorces and other high-stakes litigation. He is a partner in the firm’s Commercial Litigation Practice with more than 30 years of commercial litigation experience. He has an intimate understanding of business litigation in all its forms and has obtained substantial judgments and awards.

Craig has extensive experience handling a range of business litigation, including derivative actions, fiduciary duty lawsuits, trade secret claims, antitrust claims, class actions, intellectual property disputes, health care litigation, midstream claims, FTC claims, and business torts. Craig brings a sophisticated understanding of business litigation and is a member of the Texas Corporate Governance Team.

Craig also has significant appellate litigation experience, arguing before the Federal Circuit, the Fifth Circuit, the Texas Supreme Court, and the Dallas, Fort Worth, and San Antonio Court of Appeals, among others.

Craig has represented a range of clients, including:

  • Advantage Midstream
  • American Standard Companies
  • Barry Callebaut AG
  • Brach’s Confections Inc.
  • Denton County Electric Cooperative Inc.
  • Duraplas, LP
  • Enterprise Financial Group, Inc.
  • GameStop Inc.
  • Heeling Sports Ltd.
  • HomeServices of America, Inc.
  • Morrow Renewables, LLC
  • Neora, Inc.
  • Private Equity Partners Inc.
  • Quanex Building Products Corp.
  • Raytheon Technologies
  • Southcross Energy Partners LP
  • Sub-Zero, Inc.
  • The Andersons, Inc.
  • Vaisala Oyj

Craig Florence has more than 37 years of litigation experience across a breathtaking range of matters and controversies. In Craig’s first arbitration, he obtained a multimillion-dollar award against a Fortune 500 company. It would be the first of many multimillion-dollar awards, judgments, and settlements Craig obtained on behalf of his clients, including a multimillion exceptional case award that was subsequently appealed to the United States Supreme Court; a $32.5 million settlement in connection with a stockholder oppression claim against its publicly traded majority shareholder; a multimillion-dollar award in favor of a defense contractor involving the design and manufacturing of an electron accelerator; a multimillion-dollar arbitration award on behalf of a European-based company in connection with a post-acquisition dispute against one of Dallas’s largest companies; a multimillion-dollar judgment against a publicly traded energy company in a case involving a breach of a gas processing contract; a multimillion-dollar judgment against a publicly traded energy company based on a negligent misrepresentation claim; and the settlement of LJM2 Liquidation Statutory Trust B’s (related to Enron) fraudulent transfer action against LJM2’s limited partners.

Craig’s work is not limited to plaintiff’s cases either. Recently, Craig served as lead counsel in a lawsuit filed by the Federal Trade Commission against Neora, Inc. and its owner. Craig’s clients prevailed on all five claims asserted by the FTC. This victory represented the first time a direct selling company defeated the FTC’s pyramid scheme claims in a trial, and the first significant victory of its kind since 1979. Leading industry publication Direct Selling News described the win as “historic.” Others have lauded Craig’s work, including Chambers USA, The Best Lawyers in America and Texas Super Lawyers. Craig has been also recognized by Am Law as “Litigator of the Week” and joined the Texas Million Dollar Verdict Hall of Fame in 2013. Craig’s defense experience also reflects the depth of his experience, including successfully thwarting an incumbent director from orchestrating a hostile takeover of a board of directors; defending a manufacturer in a patent infringement action that resulted in a groundbreaking opinion by the Federal Circuit relating to provisional patent applications; defending a Dallas-based education company that settled following a two-week arbitration involving copyright, trade secret and patent claims; and the successful defense of an electric cooperative in a series of class action lawsuits involving capital credit and governance claims.

代表的な経験

  • Federal Trade Commission v. Neora, Inc. and Jeff Olson (Sept. 28, 2023, Judgment): Served as lead counsel in a trial victory on all five claims asserted by the FTC (including pyramid scheme and deceptive income and product claims). This victory represented the first time a direct selling company has defeated the FTC’s pyramid scheme claims in a trial and the first significant victory of its kind since 1979. Leading industry publication Direct Selling News described the win as “historic,” noting that had the FTC been successful, it would have had “a profound impact on the state of the law and negatively impact[ed] operations of a sizable portion of the United States economy.”
  • Obtained a multimillion-dollar judgment against a publicly traded company in a case involving the breach of a gas processing contract; the case settled on confidential terms following entry of judgment.
  • Obtained a multimillion-dollar judgment against a publicly traded energy company in connection with a gas processing project.
  • Successfully defended an electric cooperative in a series of class action lawsuits involving capital credit and governance claims.
  • Represented at the trial court a health insurance company in a patent infringement action involving computerized information management systems and obtained an exceptional case award of $5.2 million. Subsequently appealed to the United States Supreme Court, where the case stands as one of the leading cases on exceptional case findings.
  • Represented the special committee of the board of directors of a publicly traded company in its investigation into stockholder oppression by its majority stockholder and the resulting litigation against the majority stockholder; obtained a $32.5 million settlement.
  • Successfully represented a company in thwarting an incumbent director from orchestrating a hostile takeover of its board of directors.
  • Defended a Dallas-based company in a copyright infringement and trade secret arbitration involving computer software; case settled following a two-week arbitration.
  • Represented a European-based company in a post-acquisition dispute against one of Dallas’ largest publicly traded companies, resulting in a substantial arbitration award for the client.
  • Successfully obtained a substantial arbitration award in a breach of contract action involving the design and manufacturing of an electron accelerator.
  • Successfully represented a Fortune 500 financial institution against another Fortune 500 company; obtained a substantial multimillion-dollar arbitration award in favor of the client.
  • Represented LJM2 Liquidation Statutory Trust B (related to Enron) in a fraudulent transfer action against LJM2’s limited partners; case settled on confidential terms.
  • Successfully defended a company in a parent infringement action; the Federal Circuit’s opinion is the first to construe the scope of the written description requirement as it relates to provisional patent applications.
  • Successfully settled tortious interference, trade secret, and defamation claims seeking over $80 million.
  • Represented an investor defrauded out of $30 million in a complex Ponzi scheme, including a trial resulting in recovery of a seven-figure judgment against a recipient of the stolen funds.
  • Successfully defended a health plan services company in an arbitration against its former president.
  • Conducted oral arguments before the Federal Circuit, the Fifth Circuit, the Texas Supreme Court and the Dallas, Fort Worth and San Antonio Court of Appeals, among others.

受賞歴

  • Am Law “Litigator of the Week” in the U.S. (October 6, 2023) for FTC v. Neora litigation
  • Selected by his peers for inclusion in The Best Lawyers in America© in the field of Commercial Litigation (2014 – 2025)
  • Selected for inclusion to the Texas Super Lawyers® list in the field of Business Litigation (2006 – 2023)
  • 認定された、 チェンバーズUSA: アメリカを代表するビジネス弁護士 (Tom Wicker ed., Chambers & Partners)
    • Litigation: General Commercial (2016)
  • Texas Million Dollar Verdict Hall of Fame (2013)
  • Martindale-Hubbell®のPeer Review Ratings™システムにおいて、最高ランクのAV Preeminent®に格付けされました。

所属

  • テキサス州弁護士会会員
  • テキサス州弁護士財団フェロー
  • Former Chair, Aid to the Homeless Committee, Dallas Bar Association

コミュニティへの参加

  • Austin College Board of Trustees
  • Carter BloodCare (current member, former Chairman)
  • Texas Appleseed Board of Directors
  • Dallas Citizens Council (former member)
  • Austin College Alumni Board (former member)
  • Preservation Dallas Board of Trustees (former member)
  • Graduate, Dallas Regional Chamber®, Leadership Dallas
  • Honorary Board Member, Briana Haley Foundation
リーダーシップ.イメージ
2025年10月29日 フォーリー・コーポレート・ガバナンス最新情報

テキサスが先導するSEC委員長、テキサス州の新しい株主提案基準値とコーポレート・ガバナンス改革を強調

ポール・アトキンスSEC委員長は、プレカトリー・プロポーザルと証券訴訟改革をターゲットに、米国公開市場を活性化するための大胆な戦略を概説している。州法、特にテキサス州における州法が、株主の権利とコーポレート・ガバナンスをどのように再構築しうるかを学ぶ。
晴れ渡った青空の下、テキサス州会議事堂のドームが金色の星をあしらったフェンス越しに見え、右手には銅像が見える。
2025年6月30日 フォーリー・コーポレート・ガバナンス最新情報

テキサス州議会、管轄権の拡大と業務改革でビジネス裁判所を強化

2025年6月20日、グレッグ・アボット州知事は、テキサス州ビジネス・コートを管理する法令の改正と改善を制定する下院法案40号に署名した。下院法案40号は2025年9月1日に発効する。
2024年6月12日 栄誉と賞

フォーリー、ダイレクトセリング協会からパートナーシップ賞を受賞

フォーリー&ラードナー法律事務所は、ダイレクトセリング協会(DSA)へのサービスと、DSA会員に代わって大きな勝利を収めたことが評価され、DSAのパートナーシップ賞を受賞しました。
2024年4月5日 栄誉と賞

フォーリー、FTCに対するネオラの歴史的勝利でDSNからブラボー・サプライヤー賞を受賞

フォーリー&ラードナー法律事務所は、「ネオラ社の連邦取引委員会との戦いにおける極めて重要な役割」が評価され、ダイレクト・セリング・ニュース社からブラボー・サプライヤー賞を受賞した。
2023年10月6日 栄誉と賞

フォーリー弁護士、FTCに対する歴史的勝利で「今週の訴訟代理人」に選出される

フォーリー&ラードナー法律事務所のパートナー、エドワード・バーバック弁護士、クレイグ・フローレンス弁護士、ミシェル・クー弁護士は、ダラスで行われたベンチ・トライアルにおいて、スキンケアとウェルネスのダイレクト・セールス会社であるネオラ社とその創業者を弁護し、米国連邦取引委員会に歴史的勝利を収めたことで、The Am Law Litigation Daily誌の「今週の訴訟担当者」に選ばれた。
2023年10月4日 ニュース

フォーリーのFTCに対する歴史的勝利が法律専門誌で紹介される

フォーリー&ラードナー法律事務所のクライアントであるネオラ社が、連邦取引委員会を相手取った画期的な訴訟で完全な無罪を勝ち取ったという発表は、ブルームバーグ・ローの記事「ネオラ社、FTCの敗訴でねずみ講疑惑を打ち消す」など、法律専門誌で紹介された。