Ethics Drama of 2007: Qualcomm, Congress and the Pressure to Waive Attorney Client Privilege
December 4, 2007
The patent infringement lawsuit of Qualcomm v. Broadcom began innocuously and ended with a court order finding the plaintiff and its counsel knowingly violated a duty to disclosure, honesty, and good faith. The court found that conduct constituting discovery abuse exposed counsel to career imperiling orders, and the company to millions of dollars in sanctions. The company and its outside counsel each hired separate counsel, and in the resulting sanctions hearing attorney client privilege was threatened. Key leaders for Qualcomm including their General Counsel resigned. This session, presented by Kenneth S. Klein, Foley & Lardner LLP, explored how events came to this juncture, and what lessons can be learned to avoid it happening again.
Related Insights
December 24, 2025
Health Care Law Today
Gender-Affirming Care: Multi‑State Lawsuit Challenges HHS Declaration
As previously discussed in Foley’s healthcarelawtoday, on December 18, 2025, the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services (HHS) held a press conference focused on what it defined as “sex rejection procedures” (SRPs), also known as gender-affirming care (GAC) for minors, and outlined next steps.
December 23, 2025
Energy Current
FERC Opens New Paths for Co-Located Loads in PJM: What Data Center and Power Generation Developers Need to Know
Key Takeaways FERC has ordered PJM to overhaul its tariff framework for co-located generation and large loads, finding existing rules…
December 23, 2025
Foley Viewpoints
The Rush to Exit: PE Firms Pick Up the Pace in 2025
Key Points: PE firms are moving to sell portfolio companies on an accelerated timeline in 2025 after years of much longer hold…