Brinckerhoff Discusses Recent Federal Circuit Decision on Biosimilar with Bloomberg Law
December 15, 2017
Bloomberg Law Patent, Trademark & Copyright Journal – Daily Edition
Partner Courtenay Brinckerhoff was quoted in a Bloomberg Law Patent, Trademark & Copyright Journal – Daily Edition artigo, “Biosimilars Statute Trumps State Law, Appeals Court Rules,” about a recent U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ruling on the Biologics Price Competition and Innovation Act.
The court, in a December 14, 2017, ruling, held that the statute, which provides a relatively quick path for biosimilar makers to get new drug products to market, supersedes state law claims. The ruling was the second big win for biosimilar applicants this year. Earlier the U.S. Supreme Court allowed a biosimilar applicant to skip a notice period to a biologic owner before marketing its biosimilar product.
“The decision favors biosimilar applicants in that it forecloses a state law remedy for failing to comply with the BPCIA information exchange procedures, and thereby confirms that doing so is completely optional,” Brinckerhoff said. “Since the field of biosimilar litigation is relatively new, the decision does not upset any long-settled practices, although existing cases may include similar state law claims that may not survive this decision.”
The court, in a December 14, 2017, ruling, held that the statute, which provides a relatively quick path for biosimilar makers to get new drug products to market, supersedes state law claims. The ruling was the second big win for biosimilar applicants this year. Earlier the U.S. Supreme Court allowed a biosimilar applicant to skip a notice period to a biologic owner before marketing its biosimilar product.
“The decision favors biosimilar applicants in that it forecloses a state law remedy for failing to comply with the BPCIA information exchange procedures, and thereby confirms that doing so is completely optional,” Brinckerhoff said. “Since the field of biosimilar litigation is relatively new, the decision does not upset any long-settled practices, although existing cases may include similar state law claims that may not survive this decision.”
Pessoas
Notícias relacionadas
December 18, 2025
In the News
Kyle Faget Weighs in on HHS Proposed Rule Limiting Gender-Affirming Care
Foley & Lardner LLP partner Kyle Faget commented on a recent proposal from the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services in the Law360 article, “HHS Proposes Hospital Ban On Gender Care For Minors.”
12 de dezembro de 2025
Nas notícias
O presidente e CEO da Foley, Daljit Doogal, fala sobre a estratégia e o crescimento da empresa, destaque na mídia para a reeleição
O presidente e diretor executivo da Foley & Lardner LLP, Daljit Doogal, é destaque no artigo da revista The American Lawyer intitulado “Conselho da Foley renova Daljit Doogal para segundo mandato como presidente e diretor executivo”, por ter sido reeleito para um segundo mandato de quatro anos.
11 de dezembro de 2025
Nas notícias
Carrie Hoffman comenta sobre o caso da jurisdição arbitral do Supremo Tribunal dos Estados Unidos
Carrie Hoffman, sócia da Foley & Lardner LLP, comentou sobre a decisão da Suprema Corte dos Estados Unidos de julgar um caso de jurisdição arbitral no artigo da Law360 intitulado «Caso de jurisdição arbitral da Suprema Corte pode afetar casos W&H».