Brinckerhoff Discusses Recent Federal Circuit Decision on Biosimilar with Bloomberg Law
December 15, 2017
Bloomberg Law Patent, Trademark & Copyright Journal – Daily Edition
Partner Courtenay Brinckerhoff was quoted in a Bloomberg Law Patent, Trademark & Copyright Journal – Daily Edition article, “Biosimilars Statute Trumps State Law, Appeals Court Rules,” about a recent U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ruling on the Biologics Price Competition and Innovation Act.
The court, in a December 14, 2017, ruling, held that the statute, which provides a relatively quick path for biosimilar makers to get new drug products to market, supersedes state law claims. The ruling was the second big win for biosimilar applicants this year. Earlier the U.S. Supreme Court allowed a biosimilar applicant to skip a notice period to a biologic owner before marketing its biosimilar product.
“The decision favors biosimilar applicants in that it forecloses a state law remedy for failing to comply with the BPCIA information exchange procedures, and thereby confirms that doing so is completely optional,” Brinckerhoff said. “Since the field of biosimilar litigation is relatively new, the decision does not upset any long-settled practices, although existing cases may include similar state law claims that may not survive this decision.”
The court, in a December 14, 2017, ruling, held that the statute, which provides a relatively quick path for biosimilar makers to get new drug products to market, supersedes state law claims. The ruling was the second big win for biosimilar applicants this year. Earlier the U.S. Supreme Court allowed a biosimilar applicant to skip a notice period to a biologic owner before marketing its biosimilar product.
“The decision favors biosimilar applicants in that it forecloses a state law remedy for failing to comply with the BPCIA information exchange procedures, and thereby confirms that doing so is completely optional,” Brinckerhoff said. “Since the field of biosimilar litigation is relatively new, the decision does not upset any long-settled practices, although existing cases may include similar state law claims that may not survive this decision.”
People
Related News
July 24, 2025
In the News
Foley's Trial Team Featured Following Landmark Victory in Texas Trade Secret Case
Foley & Lardner LLP’s recent landmark appellate victory in a Texas trade secrets case is featured in the Texas Lawyer article, "Ruling Sets Precedent for Employment, Trade Secrets, Fiduciary Duty."
July 24, 2025
In the News
Gregory Husisian and David Simon on Tariff Evasion – 'Huge money at stake'
Foley & Lardner LLP partners Gregory Husisian and David Simon detailed the rise and risks of tariff evasion in the POLITICO article, "As Trump raises tariffs, companies find ways to cheat — and risk getting caught."
July 23, 2025
In the News
Aaron Maguregui on AI Scribes in Health Care – 'Technically, it's a third party listening'
Foley & Lardner LLP partner Aaron Maguregui shared insights on the growing applications for artificial intelligence across health care in the healthleaders article, “Is Your AI Scribe HIPAA-Compliant?“