Both trade dress rights and design patents can be used to protect product designs and packaging. But is one a better form of IP protection than the other? Leading practitioners debated the merits of trade dress and design patent rights, including:
- Which IP right works best for different types of products and industries?
- When is it worth devoting the time and resources to procure a design patent?
- What is the appropriate test for design patent infringement: the “point of novelty” test or “the ordinary observe test”?
- Which IP right is more powerful for enforcement and as a remedy in litigation?
Panelists for this session include: Nancy Lee Carter, Senior Counsel- Trademark & Copyright, Kimberly-Clark Corporation; Karen Feisthamel, Senior Legal Counsel – Intellectual Property, CVS Caremark Corporation; Cynthia Franecki, Senior Counsel, IP Litigation Practice; Kamau King, Worldwide Licensing & Retail Operations Counsel, The Coca-Cola Company; Gregory Norrod, Partner, IP Litigation Practice; Daniel Shulman, Chief Intellectual Property Counsel, Assistant General Counsel, Pactiv Corporation.
Related Insights
January 9, 2026
Foley Viewpoints
New York Further Amends CPLR §2106, Broadening and Clarifying the Use of Affirmations in Lieu of Affidavits and Other Sworn Statements
The evolution of Section 2106 from a narrow, procedural shortcut into a comprehensive substitute for affidavits, verifications, and other sworn statements marks a significant modernization and streamlining of New York practice, with this new amendment reflecting the legislature’s intent to align more with federal practice while preserving New York’s own unique statutory requirements.
January 9, 2026
Labor & Employment Law Perspectives
Navigating Workplace AI When Federal, State Policies Clash
January 9, 2026
Foley Viewpoints