Appellate Briefs Are Not the Place to Incorporate Material from Someplace Else by Reference

February 11, 2019

Buried in a footnote in the February 7 opinion in a criminal appeal is a helpful reminder for all advocates in the Seventh Circuit, including those handling civil appeals. In United States v. Moody, No. 18-1837 (7th Cir. Feb. 7, 2019), Mr. Moody sought to incorporate an argument by reference from the appellate brief of a trial court co-defendant whose appeal had not been consolidated with his.

The court declined to consider the argument, in part because, in the absence of consolidated appeals, “Moody was not permitted to incorporate by reference his codefendant’s arguments.” Slip op. at 2, n.1.

The court of appeals cited two of its prior decisions to emphasize this point: “Albrechtsen v. Bd. Of Regents of Univ. of Wisconsin Sys., 309 F.3d 433, 435–36 (7th Cir. 2002) (‘[A]ppellate briefs may not incorporate other documents by reference.’)” and “Parker v. Franklin Cty. Cmty. Sch. Corp., 667 F.3d 910, 924 (7th Cir. 2012) (rejecting defendants’ attempt to incorporate by reference arguments in their prior district-court brief).”

Judge Amy Barrett wrote for the court. Chief Judge Diane Wood and Judge Kenneth Ripple joined her opinion.

Authors

Thomas L. Shriner

Practice Areas

Appellate

Author(s)

An older man with white hair and glasses, wearing a dark suit, white shirt, and beige tie, stands in a blurred hallway of a corporate law office offering litigation support.

Thomas L. Shriner

[email protected]

Milwaukee 414.297.5601

Related Insights

View All Posts

February 1, 2023 Wisconsin Appellate Law

The Wisconsin Supreme Court Keeps Wisconsin Weird and Applies the Common Law in Its First Look at Wisconsin’s Product Liability Statute

Murphy v. Columbus McKinnon Corp., 2022 WI 109 (Dec. 28, 2022), gave the Wisconsin Supreme Court its first opportunity to interpret Wis. Stat. § 895.047, part of the Wisconsin Legislature’s 2011 product liability statute.

August 24, 2022 Wisconsin Appellate Law

Seventh Circuit Announces a New Standard for Analyzing Violations of the Ex Post Facto Clause

Those who practice municipal law in the three states that make up the Seventh Circuit now have a new standard to consider when arguing that a law violates the Constitution’s Ex Post Facto Clause.

March 17, 2022 Consumer Class Defense Counsel

Seventh Circuit Addresses Mandatory Local Controversy Exception to the Class Action Fairness Act

Since its enactment in 2005, the Class Action Fairness Act (CAFA) has provided defendants with additional opportunities to remove state-law claims to federal court.