USPTO Director Squires released updated guidance on AI-assisted inventions. The new guidance states that AI-assisted inventions are subject to the same legal standard for determining inventorship as any other invention. Notably, the guidance rescinds the previous guidance, which applied the Pannu factors for determining inventorship, treating AI as an unnamed joint inventor. The new guidance should simplify the analysis in determining when a natural person has created an invention with assistance from AI.
There is no separate or modified [inventorship]
View referenced article
standard for AI-assisted inventions.

Author(s)
Related Insights
January 6, 2026
Foley Viewpoints
Shifting Enforcement Priorities at the CFTC and the SEC
Under the new administration, priorities have shifted at the Commodity Futures Trading Commission and the Securities and Exchange Commission, particularly with the enforcement divisions at both agencies — which had faced widespread internal and external criticism. Both the CFTC and SEC are undergoing structural changes as a shift away from regulation through enforcement. This article discusses these developments in detail.
January 5, 2026
Foley Viewpoints
Fred Ridley showcased in Sports Business Journal’s “The 125 Most Influential in Sports Business of the Past 25 Years
Fred Ridley took over as chairman of Augusta National Golf Club in the fall of 2017, and in those short eight years, he has enacted…
December 24, 2025
Tariff & International Trade Resource
What Every Multinational Should Know About … Preserving the Right to IEEPA Tariff Refunds (Updated with FAQs)
Any company that has imported goods subject to the Trump administration’s fentanyl-based tariffs or reciprocal tariffs — i.e., the tariffs levied pursuant to the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (the IEEPA tariffs) — needs to consider filing an action in the U.S. Court of International Trade (CIT) to preserve the possibility of recovering refunds of these tariffs.