USPTO Director Squires released updated guidance on AI-assisted inventions. The new guidance states that AI-assisted inventions are subject to the same legal standard for determining inventorship as any other invention. Notably, the guidance rescinds the previous guidance, which applied the Pannu factors for determining inventorship, treating AI as an unnamed joint inventor. The new guidance should simplify the analysis in determining when a natural person has created an invention with assistance from AI.
There is no separate or modified [inventorship]
View referenced article
standard for AI-assisted inventions.
Author(s)
Related Insights
August 5, 2026
Foley Viewpoints
What Counts as Therapeutic Progress and Innovation in Longevity Biotechnology?
Longevity biotechnology is attracting increasing scientific, commercial, and investor interest. The unprecedented clinical success of…
August 3, 2026
Foley Viewpoints
Beyond the Headlines: A Look at Q2 Venture Activity
When it comes to venture capital (VC) activity this year, if you’re just reading the headlines, you aren’t getting the full story. We recently discussed a similar issue with the current state of merger & acquisition (M&A) activity specifically, and as CB Insights reports in their State of Venture Q2’26 report, the current snapshot of the overall venture industry is no different.
July 31, 2026
Colorado EPR Faces a Second, Broader Constitutional Challenge: What Producers Should Know
On July 30, 2026, the National Association of Wholesaler-Distributors (NAW) filed suit in the U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado against the Executive Director of the Colorado Department of Public Health & Environment (CDPHE), seeking to declare Colorado's Producer Responsibility Program for Statewide Recycling Act (the “Act”) unconstitutional and to enjoin its enforcement.