Most employers are aware of, and comply with, the requirement to include information about employees’ rights and obligations under the Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA) in employee handbooks or other written policy documents. However, employers often fail to take advantage of the opportunity to use written FMLA policies as a way to combat FMLA abuse.
Below is a list of seven provisions that employers should include in their FMLA policies if they are searching for tools to help limit such abuse.
- Require that all leave requests be in writing. All employees should be required to document their request for leave on a written request form and return that form to Human Resources unless there are unusual circumstances that prevent the employee from doing so. Requiring written leave requests helps ensure there is no misunderstanding about the type of leave being requested or the dates or circumstances giving rise to the need for leave. Requiring employees to put the leave request in writing also can make an employee think twice before making a fraudulent leave request.
- Require that FMLA leaves run concurrently with other types of paid and unpaid leave and require employees to substitute paid leave for unpaid leave, unless prohibited by state or local law. Although concurrent running of leave and substitution of paid leave provisions are subject to state and local laws, they are strong deterrents when it comes to curbing FMLA abuse. When employees know that they will have to use up their available paid leave time (i.e., vacation, sick time, personal leave, and so on) when taking FMLA leave, they are much less likely to use FMLA leave for illegitimate reasons. Additionally, if they do take FMLA leave, requiring concurrent running of leave and substitution of paid leave (when permissible) prevents employees from taking 12 weeks of unpaid FMLA leave followed by additional weeks of paid vacation or other time off.
- Inform employees that medical certifications and recertifications will be required. FMLA policies should describe when medical certifications and recertifications will be required and employers should make sure to require those certifications and recertifications whenever possible (i.e., for new leave requests, when the reason for leave changes, when leave is extended, when a new leave year starts, when the leave circumstances change, if there is a pattern of suspicious absences, if there is objective information that provides a reason to doubt the need for leave, and so on).
- Mandate strict compliance with call-in procedures. The FMLA regulations are clear that employees must comply with an employer’s “usual and customary” notice and call-in procedures, absent unusual circumstances. For example, an employer’s call-in procedures may indicate how much advance notice is required when reporting an absence, to whom the absence must be reported, what information must be provided regarding the absence, etc. Employees who do not comply with such procedures, and who do not have a justifiable excuse for failing to comply, may have their leave requests delayed or denied, so long as the call-in requirements are uniformly applied for other types of absences.
- Prohibit secondary employment while on leave. The FMLA regulations permit employers to have policies prohibiting outside or supplemental employment while on leave, so long as the policy is uniformly applied to all types of leave, not just FMLA leave. Courts have dismissed FMLA claims filed by employees who were found to be working at another job in violation of the employer’s policy prohibiting other employment while on leave.
- Require employees to sign a certification regarding their absences. The FMLA prohibits employers from asking for a medical certification or doctor’s note in connection with every FMLA absence unless the documentation is required by policy in order to use paid leave time that is being substituted for unpaid FMLA leave. However, employers may require employees to sign a personal certification or acknowledgment following each absence which confirms that the employee took the day off for a FMLA or other medical reason and acknowledges that the employee may be disciplined or terminated for providing false information to the employer. To avoid any claim that employees using FMLA leave are treated differently from other employees, the personal certification/acknowledgment should be required from all employees returning from any kind of medical leave (e.g., FMLA, worker’s compensation, ADA, personal illness, and so on).
- Inform employees that second and third opinions may be required. Because second and third opinions are always obtained at the expense of the employer, second and third opinions are usually reserved for situations in which the request for leave is unclear or suspect for some reason (e.g., conflicting information has been provided regarding the reason for leave, the certifying health professional is not an expert in the field, the amount of leave requested appears to be inconsistent with the reason for leave, and so on). However, informing an employee up front that second or third opinions may be required puts employees on notice that suspicious leave requests will not automatically be approved by the employer.
By working with employment counsel to incorporate these provisions into existing FMLA policies, employers can ensure that they are taking full advantage of the tools available to limit fraudulent FMLA requests and FMLA abuse.
免责声明
本博客由 Foley & Lardner LLP("Foley "或 "本所")提供,仅供参考。它无意代表任何客户传达本所的法律立场,也无意传达具体的法律建议。本文所表达的任何观点并不一定反映 Foley & Lardner LLP、其合伙人或其客户的观点。因此,在未向执业律师咨询之前,请勿根据本信息行事。本博客无意建立律师-客户关系,收到本博客也不构成律师-客户关系。通过本网站以电子邮件、博客文章或其他方式与富理达交流,并不构成任何法律事务的律师-客户关系。因此,您通过本博客传送给富理达的任何通信或材料,无论是通过电子邮件、博客文章或任何其他方式,都不会被视为机密或专有信息。本博客上的信息是 "按原样 "发布的,不保证其完整性、准确性和时效性。对于本网站的运行或内容,富利不作任何明示或暗示的陈述或保证。富利明确否认任何明示或默示的所有其他担保、保证、条件和陈述,无论是根据任何成文法、法律、商业使用或其他原因产生的,包括适销性、特定用途适用性、所有权和非侵权的默示保证。在任何情况下,富利或其任何合作伙伴、高级职员、雇员、代理人或附属机构均不对您或其他任何人因创建、使用或依赖本网站(包括信息和其他内容)或任何第三方网站或通过任何此类网站访问的信息、资源或材料而直接或间接引起的任何索赔、损失或损害(直接、间接、特殊、附带、惩罚性或后果性)承担任何法律责任(合同、侵权、疏忽或其他)。在某些司法管辖区,本博客的内容可能被视为律师广告。如果适用,请注意先前的结果并不保证类似的结果。照片仅供参考,其中可能包括模特。肖像并不一定意味着当前的客户、合作伙伴或雇员身份。
相关见解
December 12, 2025
Health Care Law Today
Eleventh Circuit Hears Oral Argument in Landmark Constitutional Challenge to False Claims Act’s Qui Tam Provisions
On December 12, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit heard oral argument in U.S. ex rel. Zafirov v. Florida Medical…
2025年12月11日
福莱观点
知识产权组合管理中的反垄断风险与合规策略
本文分析了知识产权组合管理如何在促进创新的同时,也可能带来潜在风险……
2025年12月11日
福莱观点
加州空气资源委员会发布SB 261和SB 253法案的拟议法规
2025年12月9日,加州空气资源委员会(CARB)发布了其针对初始法规的拟议监管文本……